Saturday, August 11, 2012

CITY COUNCIL: Resolution Implementing Collection Rate Adjustment in Connection with Exclusive Franchise Agreement between USA Waste of California, Inc. & City of Carmel-by-the-Sea


Meeting Date: August 7, 2012
Prepared by: Jason Stilwell, City Administrator

City Council
Agenda I tern Summary

Name: Consideration of a Resolution implementing a collection rate adjustment in connection with an exclusive franchise agreement between USA Waste of California, Inc. and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea.

Description: USA Waste of California, Inc. dba Carmel Marina Corporation (CMC), also known as Waste Management, has an exclusive franchise agreement to perform trash and recycling collection in the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea. Per the terms of the agreement, Waste Management submitted a letter dated November 18, 2011, requesting a collection fee adjustment increase of 3.36% effective January 1, 2012. At its February 7, 2012 meeting City Council considered the request, but did not approve any rate adjustment.
Instead, it continued the item to obtain a legal opinion, to draft an addendum, and/or to renegotiate the franchise agreement.

The 3.36% represented the cumulative impact of the price aqjustments CMC requested that were to be effective January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. CMC has not been granted a price adjustment since January 1, 2008. The first rate adjustment component relates to increased dump fees. The second component of the rate increase request is a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA).

Overall Cost:
The City can expect to realize approximately $12,000 more annually in franchise fee revenue from this rate increase.

Staff Recommendation: Although Waste Management had requested a 10.48% increase, staff recommends that the City Council approve a 5.85% rate increase. This negotiated amount includes 0.77% for disposal fee pass-through per the contract, assuming the adjustments were approved at the time requested, and 5.08% for a COLA rate increase, which reflects an amount less than the compounded 75% of CPI as provided for in the contract. Staff believes the COLA, if any, should be less than the full amount based on past performance. Going forward, utilization of the scorecard will facilitate contract compliance and provide focus to the areas that are underperforming.

Important Considerations: The typical quarterly residential bill for franchise collection and disposal services is $76.35. The proposed increase would mean an additional $4.47 on the average quarterly bill.

Decision Record: N/ A

Reviewed by:

Jason Stilwell, City Administrator Date


CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
STAFF REPORT

TO: MAYOR BURNETT AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
THROUGH: JASON STILWELL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: AUGUST 7, 2012
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IMPLEMENTING A COLLECTION RATE ADJUSTMENT IN CONNECTION WITH AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA AND USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

RECOMMENDED MOTION
Review the contract compliance scorecard and adopt the Resolution approving a 5.85% rate adjustment.

BACKGROUND
USA Waste of California, Inc. dba Cannel Marina Corporation (CMC), also known as
Waste Management, perfonns trash and recycling collection in the City of Cannel-bythe-
Sea through an exclusive franchise agreement. Per the terms of the agreement, Waste
Management submitted a letter dated November 18, 2011, requesting a collection fee
adjustment increase of 3.3 6% effective January 1, 2012. The City Council considered the
request at its February 7, 2012 meeting, did not approve any rate adjustment, and
continued the item, to obtain a legal opinion, to draft an addendum, and/or to renegotiate
the franchise agreement.
The 3.36% represented the cumulative impact of the price adjustments CMC requested
that were to be effective January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. CMC has not been
granted a price adjustment since January 1, 2008. In discussions with CMC, they
presented data reflecting the cumulative impact of the unapproved price adjustment
requests beginning January 1, 2009, which were 0.77% for the disposal component and
5.12% for the cost-of-living component. In addition, the cumulative effect of the monies
not billed and collected from Carmel ratepayers as a result of the unapproved price
adjustments was $228,065.
The agreement between the City and Waste Management provides for two rate
adjustment components.
The first rate adjustment component relates to increased dump fees. The first clause 6( d)
of the contract reads "Collector shall receive periodic pass-through rate adjustments to
cover the increased cost of dump fees at the Monterey Regional Waste Management
District site .... " This is the pass-through rate increase of 0.77% as a result of a disposal
rate increase from $46.25 to $47.00 effective January 1, 2011 and from $47.00 to $48.25
per ton effective January 1, 2012.
65
The second component of the rate increase request is a cost-of-living adjustment
(COLA). Section 6 of the contract provides that the "Collector shall be entitled to request
an increase in such rates chargeable to customers." This adjustment is based on threequarters
of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San
Francisco-Oakland Bay Area (All Items, All Urban Consumers), "less the percentage of
operating expenses attributable to dump fees paid at the disposal site ... " Using this
formula, the CPI adjustment is 5.04% or 5.12% cumulative. This includes an amount
considered but not approved by the City Council since 2009. Staff discussed with Waste
Management and recommends a COLA below the contract maximum to reflect contract
compliance issues over the past few years; the City Council is not required to adopt a
COLA amount nor one that is the full three-quarters of the percentage increase in the
CPl.
STAFF REVIEW
Waste Management did request a 10.48% increase but through negotlatwns
acknowledges the amount recommended by staff. Staff recommends that the City
Council approve a 5.85% rate increase. This negotiated amount includes 0.77% for
disposal fee pass-through per the contract assuming the adjustments were approved at the
time requested. In addition it includes 5.08% for a COLA rate increase which reflects an
amount less than the compounded 75% of CPI as provided for in the contract. Staff
believes the COLA, if any, should be less than the full amount based on past
perfonnance. Going forward utilization of the scorecard will facilitate contract
compliance and provide focus to the areas that are underperforming.
66
Requested and Unapproved rate adjustments 2009-2012
Disposal 2009 2010 2011 2012
2009 Unapproved Request 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
2010 Unapproved Request 0.00%
2011 Unapproved Request 0.29%
2012 Unapproved Request 0.48%
Cumulative Sum 0.77%
COLA
2009 Unapproved Request 2.48% 2.48% 2.48% 2.48%
2010 Unapproved Request 0.00%
2011 Unapproved Request 0.57%
2012 Unapproved Request 1.99%
Cumulative Sum 5.12%
Sum of both COLA and Disposal 5.89%
"Make whole" of both COLA and Disposal if approved when requested 10.48%
FISCAL IMP ACT
The City can expect to realize an additional approximately $12,000 annually in franchise
fee revenue from this rate increase based on a 5.85% adjustment.
Range of options
Approve Disposal pass-through increases (1)
Approve Disposal increase including retroactivity
Approve (1) plus 2011 and 2012 requests
Approve (1) plus a COLA amount less than contract maximum
Approve (1) plus contract maximum COLA (2)
Approve (1) and (2} including some retroactivity
Approve (1) and (2) and full retroactivity
0.77%
1.06%
3.33%
up to 5.81%
5.81%
up to 10.48%
10.48%
The typical residential bill for franchised collection and disposal services is $76.35 per
quarter. The proposed increase would result in quarterly bills increasing by $4.47.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Amended Exclusive Franchise Agreement, January 1. 2003
Fourth Quarter 2011-2012 Scorecard - revised 7/24/2012
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION 2012-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA IMPLEMENTING A COLLECTION RATE
ADJUSTMENT IN CONNECTION WITH AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA AND
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
WHEREAS, USA Waste of California, Inc (aka Waste Management) is the City’s
trash and recyclable goods collector; and
WHEREAS, the agreement between the City and Waste Management provides
for two rate adjustments; and
WHEREAS, Waste Management initially had requested a 10.48% increase, but
through negotiations with City staff, has acknowledged the lesser amount recommended
by staff based on prior contract compliance issues.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA DOES:
1. Approve a rate adjustment of 5.85% which includes a 0.77% disposal fee
pass-through and a 5.08% cost of living (COLA) increase.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA this 7th day of August 2012, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
ATTEST: ___________________________
JASON BURNETT, MAYOR
_____________________
Heidi Burch, City Clerk
67
68
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
ERANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
AMENDED EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDED AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") entered into
between USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., doing business as CARMEL MARINA
CORPORATION, ("herein after referred to as "Collector") and the CITY OF CARMEL-BYTHE-
SEA (hereinafter referred to as "City") is made this 2ih day of January 2003.
THIS AMENDED AGREEMENT supersedes the Exclusive Franchise Agreements
entered into between USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and the CITY OF CARMEL-BYTHE-
SEA on 17 January 1995,7 February 1996, and all subsequent Addenda thereto.
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereby
mutually agree as follows:
1. GRANT OF FRANCIDSE
City hereby grants to Collector an exclusive franchise for the regularly scheduled
collecting, hauling, recycling, and disposing of all garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes,
refuse and rubbish within all residential zones of said City limits as presently existing or
hereafter modified for the tetm of this Agreement. Collector shall also have the exclusive right
and privilege to collect and dispose of all garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse,
and rubbish, as often as required within all the commercial district zones of the City and for all
R-1 motels in the City for the term of this Agreement and the right and privilege to collect, have
and retain all charges and fees for such collecting, hauling, recycling, and disposing of garbage.l
recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse and rubbish, as specified in Chapter 8.16, Sections
8.16.010 through 8.16.160 of the Municipal Code of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea. This
69
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Agreement shall not be construed as prohibiting any owner from occasionally disposing of his
own garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse, rubbish, or other waste.
2. TERM
The term of the existing Amended Exclusive Franchise Agreement between the parties is
from 1 January 2003 to 30 June 2015. The term of this Amended Exclusive Franchise
Agreement is from the date of its execution by the parties through 30 June 2015. City shall have
the right to renew this Agreement at its expiration under such terms and conditions as may be
agreeable to the parties.
3. FRANCHISE PAYMENTS; DELINQUENCY; GUARANTEE
In consideration of the exclusive franchise granted herein, Collector agrees to pay to City
the sum of ten percent ( 10%) of gross revenues received from its customers within City, payable
four (4) times per annum on the last day of July, October, January and April for the previous
quarter's revenue collections during the term of this Agreement. Gross revenues will include
any profit resulting from the sale of mandatory collection of all recyclable materials and yard
waste within City. Payment shall be mailed to:
City Administrator
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
City Hall
P.O. Box CC
Carmel, California 93921
Payments made after the date due shall be considered delinquent. Collector shall pay a
late charge of two percent (2%) per month, or any part thereof, on the amount delinquent to
cover added administrative expense incurred by City by reason of such delinquency. The parties
agree that such late charge represents a fair estimate of such added expense.
- 2 -
70
4. INDEPENDENT AUDIT
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
City may at any time, by action of its City Administrator or an outside certified public
accountant, conduct an audit and rate analysis of services, examination or review of the annual
financial statements of Collector, including any of its local divisions operating in the greater
Monterey Bay Tri-County area. Such audit examination, analysis or review shall be at the
expense of City unless collector has failed to submit a timely annual audit as required in this
Agreement and; provided, however, that should any audit, examination or review of Collector's
records reveal an underpayment of more than three percent (3%) of any fee required under this
Agreement, Collector shall bear the entire cost of the audit, examination or review.
5. REGULATION OF COLLECTION
Collector agrees to comply with the regulations for collection of garbage as set forth in
Chapter 8.16, Section 8.16.145 of the Municipal Code of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, as the
same may from time to time be amended. The term garbage, recycle materials, yard waste,
ashes, refuse and rubbish as used in this Agreement shall be deemed to be used as defined in
Chapter 8.16 of the aforementioned Municipal code.
6. COLLECTION RATES
Collector shall have the right to collect, have and retain the rates and fees for the
collecting, hauling, recycling, and disposing of garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes,
refuse and rubbish specified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which are in effect at the time of
execution of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Collector shall be entitled to
request an increase in such rates chargeable to customers. If approved by Resolution of the City
- 3-
71
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, the approval shall be subject to the following
conditions:
a. Collector gives written notice of the amount and the effective date of the proposed
rate increase to the City 30 days prior to written notice to its customers. Once City
acknowledges_receipt of notice, Collector shall mail written notices to all its customers
no less than sixty (60) days prior to the proposed effective date of the increase agreed
upon between the City and Collector.
b. Collector has not increased its rates m the twelve (12) months immediately
proceeding the proposed effective date of the increase.
c. At no cost to City, Collector shall annually provide City with the financial
statements of the Carmel Marina Corporation prepared by a Certified Public Accountant.
Financial statements shall also include a combining schedule showing the operating
results for all divisions of the Company, including complete information regarding how
costs were allocated to Carmel Marina Corporation's Carmel-by-the-Sea's service
operations and complete information with respect to charges from related parties. The
City's goal is to clearly understand and determine the overall fairness of the stand-alone
information for all collection service provided City by Collector. City reserves the right
to request in writing any reasonably related financial information of Collector in regard
to the proposed rate increase. Said financial information shall be provided to City within
fifteen (15) days of Collector's receipt of the written request therefor.
d. The amount of the proposed cost-of-living portion of the rate increase does not
exceed the lesser of ten percent ( 10%) of the existing rate or three-quarters (3/4) of the
percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco - Oakland
- 4 -
72
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Bay Area (All Items, All Urban Consumers) as published by the United States
Department of Labor for the Twelve-(12)-month period immediately prior to the date of
the written notice; less the percentage of operating expenses attributable to dump fees
paid at the disposal site operated by the Monterey Regional Waste Management District.
Formulas
General Increase Per Contract
CPl. Percent (12 - month period) x % (per contract) = percent request.
Revenue per latest Collector's financial statement minus dump fee expenditure minus
"Waste Wheeler" rental revenue = adjusted income.
Adjusted income x percent request = dollar increase.
Dollar increase: by Revenue per latest Collector's financial statement x 1.11 Franchise
Fee factor= Adjusted percentage increase.
d. Collector shall receive periodic pass-through rate adjustments to cover the
increased cost of dump fees at the Monterey Regional Waste Management District site as
follows:
i. Upon announcement by the Monterey Regional Waste Management
District of a dump fee rate increase at the disposal site, Collector shall submit, in
writing, data to the City Administrator indicating the impact of the announced
dump fee rate increase on Collector's operating expenses and the percentage of
pass-through adjustment required for the dump fee increase.
ii. Upon approval of the City Administrator, Collector shall be entitled to
increase rates by the pass-through percentage on the effective date of the disposal
- 5-
73
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
site rate increase as established by the Monterey Regional Waste Management
District.
iii. Collector shall give notice to the City by mail of the amount and purpose
of the rate increase and no more than thirty (30) days thereafter to its customers
which will not be less than sixty (60) days in advance of the first billing during
which the rate increase takes effect. City may request a public hearing on said
increase by written notice served on Collector within thirty (30) days of the date of
its receipt of the written notice of rate increase. If such a hearing is requested, City
shall determine the amount of an appropriate rate increase based upon the financial
information provided by Collector and any other relevant information it may wish
to consider.
iv. Collector shall be entitled to the pass-through increase only for increases
in the dump fees charged to franchised Collectors and not for increases in the
dump fees for materials which do not impact Collector's operating expenses for
services to residential and commercial customers in the City limits of City. Dump
fee decreases will be computed in the same manner as increases.
v. In any event, except for increases in dump fees, Collector shall be entitled
to not more than one (1) rate increase in any twelve- (12)- month period for the
purpose of either a cost-of-living adjustment or automatic pass-though of dump fee
increases as set by the Monterey Regional Waste Management District.
Formula
Dump Fee Increase/Decrease
Percentage of new increase/decrease times dump fee per expenditure per latest
Collector's financial statement equals the dollar increase/decrease on dump fees
- 6 -
74
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
divided by total revenue, Jess "Waste Wheeler" rental revenue per latest Collector's
financial statement x 1.11 Franchise Fee factor equals percentage of
increase/decrease to consumer.
7. OWNERSHIP
Collector shall become the absolute owner of all garbage, recycle materials, yard waste,
ashes, refuse and rubbish collected under this Agreement and shall have the right to salvage all
or any portion of said materials. Collector shall provide, upon request, copies of waste disposal
manifests and comply with all State and Federal environmental laws and regulations in the event
that any collected materials from the waste stream become identified as hazardous materials.
Any and all proceeds received from salvage operations shall be the property of Collector without
any obligation on the part of Collector to account to City for any portion of said proceeds.
8. LAWS TO BE OBSERVED
The services to be performed by Collector under this Agreement shall be performed in a
good and careful manner, and in accordance with sanitary, environmental and all other laws and
ordinances presently in force or hereafter enacted governing the performance of franchise work,
by those engaging or employed in the work, or materials and equipment used in the work, by the
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Monterey County, the State of California or by the federal
government.
9. DAYS AND HOURS OF COLLECTION
Collector shall provide regular garbage, recycling, yard waste, ashes, refuse, and rubbish
collection to both residential and commercial customers in City during the term of this
Agreement, with garbage, recycling materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse, and rubbish being
collected at least once each week for residential service and as often as required for commercial
- 7 -
75
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
accounts as specified in Chapter 8.16 of City's Municipal Code. No residential collections shall
be made before 6:00 a.m. or after 6:00p.m. No commercial collections shall be made before
7:00a.m. or after 6:00p.m. The days of collection shall be determined by mutual agreement of
City and Collector, and shall include Saturdays, Sundays and holidays.
10. LOCATION OF CONTAINERS FOR COLLECTION
Garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse and rubbish in all commercial zones
shall be screened and placed in a location convenient for both storage and collection. All
garbage, recycle materials and yard waste receptacles in the R - 1 Residential District shall be
located in the rear or side yard setback, screened from public view, and shall be collected,
emptied, and returned to their original location by the collector not the occupant of the premises.
In all zoning districts of the City, the required commingled recycling receptacles shall be carts
provided by the City's recycling collector, with the goal to provide implementation by 1 January
2003. These receptacles are not intended for curbside placement and occupants of the premises
shall not be responsible for the placement or retrieval from the curbside following collection.
The Collector shall collect and return all receptacles to the designated location in either the rear
or side yard set back of the property. In case of disagreement between Collector and the
occupant as to the location and collection of receptacles in any zone, the City Administrator or
his/her designated representative shall determine the location.
11. CLEANLINESS
Collector shall maintain all equipment operated by it in safe repair. Collector shall not
litter the premises of residential or commercial customers or municipal property in the process of
making collections nor allow garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse, rubbish or
- 8 -
76
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE 1 JANUARY 2003
liquids to blow or fall from any vehicle used for collections. City shall charge Collector for
actual expenses it incurs for any cleanup services from spills caused by Collector.
12. LABOR AND MATERIALS
Collector shall furnish all necessary labor, equipment and materials required for the
proper performance of services under this Agreement.
13. PUBLIC LIABILITY AND PROPERTY INSURANCE/HOLD HARMLESS
Collector shall indemnify, defend and save City, its public officials, officers, employees
and agents, harmless of and from all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of every kind
and description resulting directly or indirectly, arising out of, or in any way connected with the
performance of or due to any accident or mishap due to garbage, recycle materials, yard waste,
ash, refuse, rubbish, liquid or hazardous waste collections, including any containers or their
contents being placed on public property, or any recycling collection programs including any
containers or bins and their contents being placed on public property or any other services by
Collector under this Agreement, provided such action is not proximately caused by the
negligence of City or its agents. City shall at all times during the term of this Agreement be held
harmless by Collector in regard to any actions arising from the award of the franchise hereunder.
Collector shall at all times during the term of this Agreement maintain in effect all required
insurance coverage's. Annually, the Collector shall provide City with a certificate of insurance
and attached endorsement page specifically naming "the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, its public
officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds on all policies."
- 9 -
77
a. Public Liability and Property Insurance:
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Collector agrees to provide City with a Certificate of Insurance and attached
endorsement page from an insurance carrier acceptable to City certifying that Collector
has public liability and property damage insurance with limits of not less than two
million dollars ($2,000,000.00) combined single limit for personal injury and property
damage. The certification and attached endorsement page shall indicate this insurance is
primary over any other valid or collectible insurance City may have, that it insures
Collector's performance responsibilities of this Agreement and that the insurance canier
shall be required to give thirty (30) days prior written notice to City in the event of any
material change in the policy, including cancellation, nonrenewal or expiration thereof.
The Certificate of Insurance and attached endorsement page shall be. signed by an
authorized official of the insurance carrier.
b. Workers' Compensation Insurance:
Collector shall maintain adequate Workers' Compensation Insurance under the
laws of the State of California for all labor employed by it or by any subcontractor under
it who may come within the protection of such Workers' Compensation laws of the State
of California, and shall provide, where practicable, employer's general liability insurance
for the benefit of its employees and the employees of any subcontractor under it not
protected by such compensation laws, and proof of such insurance, satisfactory to City,
shall be given by filing certificates of such insurance with City, in form satisfactory to
City. If such insurance is underwritten by any agency other than the State Workers'
Compensation Fund, such agency shall be a company authorized to do business in the
- 10-
78
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
State of California. Collector shall not commence work until certified proof of insurance
has been provided and received by the City.
14. PERMITS AND LICENSES
Collector shall procure and maintain in force and effect all necessary governmental
permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees and give all notices necessary to the due and lawful
prosecution of its work. Collector shall have met all City business license requirements and be
in possession of all required City license(s) upon acceptance of this Agreement by City. All of
collector's vehicles, operating within the City limits of Carmel-by-the-Sea, shall clearly display a
delivery sticker affixed on the left rear bumper of each vehicle.
15. BILLING
Collector shall perform and be responsible for all billing and make all collections in
regard to the service it performs and neither City, nor its public officials, officers, employees or
agents shall be liable for any nonpayment or delinquency in payment of the fees and charges for
garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse or rubbish collection services performed
under this Agreement. Collector shall have the right to bill customers for service three (3)
months in advance of the performance thereof.
16. DISPOSAL
All garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse, rubbish, and other waste
collected (except that salvaged pursuant to paragraph 7 above) shall be disposed of in the place
or specific facilities provided by the Monterey Regional Waste Management District, in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the agreement now in effect between City and said
- II -
79
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
District, including all amendments or renegotiations thereof, and the rules and regulations of said
District. Collector shall pay all fees and charges for disposal.
17. SPECIAL GARBAGE, RECYCLE MATERIALS, YARD WASTE, ASHES,
REFUSE AND RUBBISH COLLECTION SERVICES
Special services shall be provided by Collector to City, residents and/or commercial
customers. The following services have previously been calculated as part of the rate structure
charged to all customers within the City Limits of Carmel-by-the-Sea and shall be provided at no
additional cost.
a. Quarterly bulk collection service
Collector shall provide special pick-up of one cubic yard of refuse at all residential
properties. Quarterly bulk collection information shall be noticed by mail to each
location receiving collection service. The first quarterly bulk collection shall be made
during the first week of January unless an alternative date is agreed upon between the
City and Collector and notice provided to each customer in the preceding quarterly news
letter.
b. Special Commercial District Collection Services
Twice daily seven days per week (once before 11 :00 a.m. and once after 1:30
p.m., but not later than 3:00p.m.):
• All City owned curb side garbage receptacles in commercial district
• All garbage and recycle receptacles at:
Devendorf Park
First Murphy Park
Piccadilly Park
Forest Hill Park
Margarita Park/Post Office Parking Lot
Vista Lobos
• All Carmel Beach curbside garbage and recycle receptacles along Scenic Road
between 81
h Ave. south to Martin Way
- 12 -
80
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
• All beach garbage receptacles at the bottom of each stairway access and at
various central locations from the north beach area to south end of Carmel
Beach (total 12 receptacles) once daily.
Note: -Collector to provide City with receptacles to include stenciled
print and international graphics denoting garbage or recycle
collection. Receptacle size and color selected by City.
-Collector may access beach and collect garbage from receptacles
by use of a City vehicle designated by the Forest, Parks and Beach
Department.
• Collection of all City garbage receptacles on both sides of Ocean A venue
from Carpenter Street west to and including the lower Ocean A venue parking
lot at Carmel Beach and the volleyball courts behind beach restrooms. (once
daily).
c. Sunset Center Collection Services
Minimum of a twenty-(20)-yard debris box and twice weekly collections
(Monday and Friday)
d. Public Works Corporation Yard Collection Services
At least twice weekly, or more often as necessary, trash and debris shall be
collected and transported from the City's Public Works Corporation Yard
between hours of 8:00 and 11:00 a.m. and 1:30 and 4:00p.m. Monday through
Friday. Total number of debris boxes shall not exceed 200 in any calendar year.
All dump fees to be included as part of any automatic pass-through dump fee rate
increase announced by the Monterey Regional Waste Management District.
e. Scout House Collection Services
At least two (2) 96-gallon waste wheeler garbage and recycle receptacles
at City's Scout House located at the northeast corner of Mission Street and Eighth
A venue. Said containers shall be collected Tuesday and Thursday of each week.
- 13-
81
f. Forest Theatre Collection Services
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
All waste wheeler trash and recycle container collections and recycle
awareness training programs as follows:
• Summer season schedule April through October ( 5 days weekly)
Monday
Wednesday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
• Winter season schedule November through March ( 3 days weekly)
Monday
Wednesday
Friday
• Recycle awareness program
Provide annual summer theatre season recycle awareness training for all
theatre user groups prior to each group's season opening.
• Yard waste/wood waste recycle collection
Provide minimum one 20 yard debris box for each Forest Theatre user
group during post theatrical season for set deconstruction, and wood
recycling and one box of appropriate size for garbage and waste.
g. Fire and Police Departments Collection Service
One (1) each, two (2)-yard dumpsters at City's Fire Department located on
Sixth Avenue between Mission and San Carlos Streets, and at City's Police
Department located at the southeast comer of Junipero and Fourth A venues. Said
dumpsters shall_be collected weekly.
h. Special Events
Four (4)-yard dumpsters or 96 gallon waste wheeler receptacles as
determined by City for City sponsored special events or holiday weekends.
- 14-
82
Occasion
July 4th
Sand Castle Contest
Surfabout Contest
Memorial Day Weekend
Labor Day Weekend
i. Holida;y Tree Rec;ycle
.....
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA. INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Maximum Dumpsters
10
6
6
6
6
In December and January provide 30-yard debris boxes, as needed, for
collection of discarded holiday trees at City designated locations as part of City's
yard waste collection services.
18. COLLECTION OF CITY WASTE
Collector shall provide collection service of garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes,
refuse and rubbish to the facilities of City listed on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference. The frequency of collection at these facilities is detailed in Exhibit "B."
Collection of garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse and rubbish by Collector at
any additional City facilities shall be by mutual written agreement, and for additional
consideration to Collector.
19. RECYCLING AND YARD WASTE SERVICES AND PROGRAMS
The recycling program that is in existence for residential and commercial customers
within the Carmel-by-the-Sea city limits at the time of execution of.this Agreement shall remain
in effect during the term hereof.
a. Weekly collection of all commingled recycle materials including paper,
magazines, aluminum, glass, bi-metal cans, cardboard, yard waste, and numbers 1
- 15-
83
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE !JANUARY 2003
through 7 plastics in the residential and commercial zones at the time of normal
refuse collection.
b. Collector shall supply all residential and commercial customers with the
required commingled, single source recycling and a yard waste (64 gallon size or
smaller) receptacle with the goal to provide implementation by 1 July 2002. Size
of each determined per customer's choice.
c. Upon receiving a request from any customer within City's boundaries,
Collector shall make available to said customer(s), at Collector's cost, composting
bins for the purpose of recycling compostable yard waste materials. Collector
shall also make composting bins available to City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
customers, through advertising in each issue of its regular quarterly newsletter.
d. In addition to cardboard recycling collections, Collector shall provide, free
of charge, two (2) two (2) yard dumpster containers for central collection of
recycled cardboard. Cardboard recycling containers shall be located on City
property at two (2) locations designated by City. Collector shall pick up all clean
recycled cardboard three (3) times each week.
e. Collector shall provide ongoing educational information to customers
about all source-reduction recycling programs to all residents and businesses via
regular billing notices, the Collector's quarterly newsletter and local news media.
New customers within City shall receive educational information about all
recycling programs and necessary receptacles for commingled recycling materials,
yard waste and garbage.
- 16-
84
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
f. All programs are to be viewed as City of Carmel-by-the-Sea sourcereduction
recycling programs. Information about the programs and encouragement
to participate will be presented in local media by City representatives.
g. All recycle programs will include City's commercial and residential zones.
Collector shall make a daily pickup of recyclables 7 days per week in all
commercial zones.
h. On January 1, 1989, City approved a 4.2% rate increase to Collector to
cover costs of the recycling program's implementation. This increase was applied
to the rate in effect at that time. Any future adjustments to the fee charged for
recycling must be negotiated between City and Collector, but will not be based in
any way to increases derived via pass-through adjustments.
i. The parties hereto agree to pursue additional recycling programs and any
other mandates established as a result of California State Assembly Bill 939 or
other local, state, or federal legislation as determined by both parties hereto.
j. The recycling program described herein shall remain in effect during the
entire term of this Agreement unless a release from City is given.
20. CITY PARKS RECEPTACLES AND ENCLOSURES BY 1 JULY 2002 AND
BEYOND
a. Provide commingled recycle and garbage receptacles in various City Parks as
directed by City.
b. Provide City designed receptacle enclosures at collectors expense as directed
by City reimbursement for expenses to be determined.
Locations and quantity:
Forest Hill Park (2)
- 17-
85
Devendorf Park (3)
Murphy Park (2)
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Mission Trail Nature Preserve and Native Plant Garden (2)
21. CLEANING OF COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SIDEWALKS AND
CURBSIDE TRASH CONTAINERS AND ENCLOSURES
• Scrub clean and keep free of accumulated garbage and debris all sidewalks,
trash containers and enclosures in the Commercial District between 3rd and 81
h
Avenue and from Junipero Avenue to Monte Verde Avenue. Also include all
Scenic Road trash enclosures from 8th Avenue to Martin Way.
SIDEWALK CLEANING CONTRACT
Specifications:
1. Work consists of hot water pressure wash of the following sidewalks:
Bid Item #1: City Area shown within the broken outline (refer to map next page).
Except for the east side of Junipero between 7th and 81
h A venues, north and south sides of
8th A venue between Junipero A venue and Mission Street, and north and south sides of
5th Avenue between Monte Verde and Lincoln Streets, sidewalk cleaning includes both
sides of the street.
a. First 2 weeks in October 2003/2004 and as modified from time to time.
b. Last 2 weeks in May 2003/2004 and as modified from time to time.
Bid Item #2: Ocean Avenue, Devendorf Park, Piccadilly Park shown within yellow
cross-hatched area (refer to map next page). Sidewalk cleaning includes both sides of
Ocean A venue and the sidewalks bordering Devendorf Park and those inside the park.
a. First 2 weeks in January 2003/2004 and as modified from time to time.
b. Last 2 weeks in July 2003/2004 and as modified from time to time.
2. Cleaning includes City wooden trash enclosures, covers and underneath cans.
3. All work to include capture of wash off materials larger than W'.
4. Contractor to use non-potable water from the City cistern at Del Mar Beach or other
source if preferred. A City water trailer is not available for contractor use.
5. Work is to be performed between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m., Monday
- 18-
86
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
through Friday. When cleaning walks within 100 feet of any Hotel/Motel, contractor
shall commence work no earlier than 7:30a.m.
Dates for cleaning may be modified by mutual agreement of City, contractor and Carmel Marina
Corporation. Additional cleanings shall be based on time and material and shall be negotiated
with contractor and Carmel Marina Corporation. Any increase in contract costs above the
current fee of $13,900 will be at City expense unless contract is renegotiated and Carmel Marina
Corporation adjusts the collection rates to cover costs.
Contract and Billing
The City shall coordinate and manage contract. Contractor shall mail all invoices directly to:
Carmel Marina Corporation
Attn: District Manager
P. 0. Box 1306,
Castroville, CA 95012.
A copy of each invoice billed for work described in the Sidewalk Cleaning Contract shall
also be mailed to the Director of Public Works at P. 0. Box SS, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921.
22. PURCHASE OF AN ALL TERRAIN VHEICLE EVERY TWO YEARS
A rate adjustment of 0.3% effective 1 January 2003, for acquisition of an All Terrain
Vehicle (ATV) and every two years thereafter for beach trash and recycle collection as well as
emergency response. The City will select the vehicle and warranty package at a price not to
exceed $8,400, purchase the vehicle and invoice the Carmel Marina Corporation for
reimbursement.
23. ANNUAL BULK PURCHASE OF MUTT-MITTS
A rate of 0.8% effective 1 January 2003 and annually thereafter, allows for annual bulk
purchase not to exceed $10,000 worth of Mutt-Mitts. The City will purchase the supplies and
invoice Carmel Marina Corporation for reimbursement.
24. ANNUAL REPLACEMENT OF SIDEWALK AND ROADSIDE TRASH
RECEPTACLES
At a rate adjustment of 0.2% effective January 2003, and annually thereafter, allows
annual replacement of 15 trash receptacles, enclosures and covers for a total aggregate
expenditure not to exceed $3,000 annually. The City will acquire and install the units and will
invoice the Carmel Marina Corporation for reimbursement following installation.
- 19-
87
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
25. ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION TO NON-PROFIT YOUTH SERVICE
ORGANIZATIONS
The City and collector agree that local youth serving non-profit organizations should be
sustained and encouraged. Towards that goal, the City proposes that in exchange for a financial
grant, each youth organization shall assist the City in its quest to expand recycling efforts by
educating youth about the benefits of recycling programs. The collector agrees to annually
donate $18,000 divided evenly between participants. In return, the City and Collector's
representatives shall work together with each organization coordinating an annual recycling
event for each youth serving organization. The recycling event must benefit Carmel and its
environs. The annual contribution shall not be included as part of the rate adjustment. Those
youth serving organizations identified as candidates, but not necessarily all-inclusive, are:
•Carmel Youth Center
•Mayor's Youth Fund
•Children's Experimental Theater
•Carmel Youth Baseball
•Local Boy Scout Troops
• Local Girl Scout Troops
The annual donation for Carmel youth serving organizations shall be paid to the City
before the last day of January of each year for equal distribution by City based on completion of
each group's annual recycling event. City shall submit an invoice to USA Waste of California
Inc./Carmel Marina Corporation in January on an annual basis. Funds will be distributed to
those local non-profit youth serving organizations that participated in a City approved annual
recycling event.
26. DEDICATION OF MATERIALS RECOVERY (MRF) FACILITY TO
PUBLIC USE
City shall have the right to full use of, and access to, the Collector's Material Recovery
-20-
88
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE 1 JANUARY 2003
Facility (MRF) located in Castroville, California, during the useful life of the facility as
part of Monterey County's Integrated Waste Management Plan. No transfer of the ownership of
the MRF shall occur without the consent of City, which consent may not be unreasonably
withheld. The land upon which Collector constructs the MRF shall contain a deed restriction, in
a form satisfactory to City, assuring the public use of, and access to, same for its intended
purpose and providing for its reversion and conveyance to appropriate public agency or agencies
upon breach of that condition. Sale of the MRF or part of the land and other buildings that
comprised the Castroville property owned by the collector prior to retirement of the mortgage,
shall include an appropriate franchise rate reduction for the City that reflects the City's
proportional contribution necessary to retire the long-term debt attributed to property acquisition,
development and operations. If any agency or entity which is not a fiscal participating agency in
the initial construction and asset acquisition of the MRF later requests or obtains service from the
MRF, the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea shall have the option of receiving a refund or a credit in its
collection or service fees of the amount of its proportionate contribution. If the MRF ceases to be
utilized by the Contractor any time during the term of this Franchise Agreement, City shall be
refunded or credited in its collection rates its proportionate financial contribution to the MRF
capital costs from any sale of property or equipment of the MRF.
27. ASSEMBLY BILL 939 INDEMNIFICATION
A.B. 939 Indemnification. Provided that the City Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-
Sea has acted reasonably, within its discretion as a legislative body, to adopt and implement all
solid waste diversion services, programs, and activities as requested by Collector, and provided
that same are within the City's authority and ability to implement, then Collector agrees to
- 21 -
89
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
protect, defend (with counsel approved by City), and indemnify City against all fines or penalties
imposed by the California Integrated Waste Management Board in the event the source reduction
and recycling goals or any other requirements of A.B. 939, or any amendments thereto, are not
met by the City; provided, however, that the Collector's liability for said fines or penalties shall
be limited to that percentage of the total of the City is waste-stream that Collector has collected
during the preceding period as identified in the most_ current update of the master plan referred to
in Section 4.02.
28. PORTABLE CHEMICAL TOILET SERVICES
During the term of this Agreement, Collector agrees to provide ten (1 0) portable chemical
toilets on each of the following occasions at Carmel Beach:
0
0
0
Memorial Day weekend
Beach Walkway/41
h of July
Surfabout Contest
0
0
Labor Day
Sand Castle Contest
Portable chemical toilets shall be delivered to west side of Scenic Road at Eighth A venue. City
staff shall be responsible for locating each unit on the beach adjacent to stairway. At no cost to
City, Collector shall be responsible for daily pumping and cleaning of all toilets on the days of an
event, celebration, or holiday and on any days included as part of the event, celebration or
holiday including Saturdays, Sundays and/or holidays. If City does not use the number of
portable units specified per event, Collector shall provide an equivalent number of unit(s) at any
other time(s) and for any other purpose(s) as specified by City. If City exceeds the total number
of units specified in the Agreement in any year, Collector may bill City for normal costs
incurred.
-22-
90
29. DROP-BOXES
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Any other provision hereof notwithstanding the franchise granted under this Agreement
shall include Collector's exclusive right and privilege to provide drop-box service within the
City limits of Carmel-by-the-Sea. The materials to be collected as part crl' said drop box service
may include garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse, rubbish, and any other waste.
30. ESTABLISHING ROUTES
Collector shall have the right to establish and change collection routes and collection
days to provide for efficient operation and service. If any such route change results in a change
of regular collection day, the occupant of the affected premises shall be given at least ten (10)
days notice in writing of said change. If a route change results in a collection at any premises on
a later week day than the previous collection date, Collector shall provide one extra collection for
the premises so affected, so that garbage, recycle materials, yard waste, ashes, refuse and rubbish
will not accumulate more than seven (7) consecutive days.
31. ALTERNATIVE DUMPSTER OR DROP-BOX SERVICE
If for a period of more than two (2) business days, Collector is temporarily unable to
provide service (dumpster, drop-box), customers may, after notice to Collector, obtain alternate
service for a period of not more than thirty (30) days.
32. DEFAULT BY COLLECTOR
All terms and conditions herein are considered material in the event Collector defaults in
the performance of any of the covenants or agreement to be kept, done or performed by it under
the terms of this Agreement. City shall give Collector written notice, either by mail or personal
service, setting forth the default. If Collector fails, neglects or refuses for a period of six (6) days
-23-
91
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
after service of such written notice to remedy the default, then City, after notice and Public
Hearing before the City Council, may cancel and annul this Agreement and all rights and
privileges of Collector hereunder, and may pursue any other remedy provided by law.
33. INSOLVENCY
If Collector shall, at any time during the term of this Agreement, become insolvent, or if
proceedings in bankruptcy shall be instituted by, or against Collector, or if Collector shall be
judged bankrupt or insolvent by any court, or if a receiver or trustee in bankruptcy or a receiver
of any property of Collector shall be appointed in any suit or proceeding brought by or against
Collector, or if Collector shall make any assignment for the benefit of creditors, then in each and
every case, this Agreement and the rights and privileges granted hereunder shall immediately
cease, terminate, and be forfeited and canceled; provided that if Collector shall, within six (6)
days after the filing and service on Collector of any involuntary petition in bankruptcy or for
appointment of a receiver, commence proper proceedings to dismiss or deny the petition or
vacate the receivership and shall expeditiously pursue and diligently exhaust all proper remedies
toward that end, the bankruptcy or receivership shall not constitute a default until the entry of a
final determination adverse to Collector.
34. EMERGENCY OPERATION
If a state of emergency is found to exist and Collector defaults or is unable to perform
under the terms of this Agreement, City, by adoption of a Resolution by four-fifths (4/5) vote of
the City Council, may take temporary possession of Collector's facilities and equipment and
operate the franchise during the period of emergency, for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days,
under such terms and conditions as will protect the public health, safety, and welfare. At the end
- 24-

I
92
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
of the thirty (30) days, City, by further Resolution of the City Council adopted by four-fifths
( 4/5) vote, may extend the period of City' operation or, if such emergency has ended, determine
the compensation to be paid to Collector for use of the franchise, said compensation to be paid to
Collector for use of the franchise, said compensation to be gross revenue less costs and expenses
and City's ten percent (1 0%) franchise fee for the period during which City temporarily assumed
the obligations of Collector.
35. ASSIGNABILITY
This franchise shall not be assignable either voluntarily or involuntarily by operation of
law, without the approval and prior consent of the City Council.
36. TERMINATION BY COLLECTOR
In the event Collector defaults in the performance of any of the terms of this Agreement,
City shall give Collector written notice, either by mail or personal service, setting forth the
default. If Collector fails, neglects or refuses for a period of six (6) days after receipt of such
notice to remedy the default then City may terminate this Agreement and all rights and privileges
of Collector hereunder. Collector may terminate this Agreement at any time upon the giving of
one hundred eighty (180) days written notice to City.
37. SERV ABILITY
If any term or provision of this Agreement shall to any extent, be determined by a court
of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder this Agreement shall not
be affected thereby, and each other term and provision shall be valid and enforceable to the
fullest extent permitted by law.
- 25-
93
38. MODIFICATION
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE I JANUARY 2003
Any modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both
parties hereto.
39. NOTICES
All notices required or given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be
deemed properly served when delivered in person or deposited, first-class postage prepaid, in the
United States mail, addressed to:
City Administrator
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
BoxCC
Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921
40. ATTORNEY'S FEES
Collector:
District Manager
USA Waste of California, Inc.
dba Carmel Marina Corporation
P.O. Box 1306
Castroville, CA 95012
Should either party to this Agreement bring legal action (lawsuit, mediation, or
arbitration) against the other, the case shall be handled in Monterey County, California, and the
party prevailing in such action shall be entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee which shall be
fixed by the judge hearing the case and such fee shall be included in the judgment, together with
all costs.
-26-

USA WASTEOFCALJFORN!A, !NC
FRA CHJSE AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE 27 JANUARY 2003
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by the
undersigned duly authorized persons and attested by the appropriate officer.
"City"
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
a municipal corporation of the State
of California
By: ~~~
Sue McCloud
Mayor
Date: / /:2 5" /o3 ----~, ----~~--------
ATTEST:
~~ KAREN CROUCH
City Clerk
Date
Chy B31VOoiAIGnrboydWII5tt Mono~cmcm Fmnchiso Asrccmcnt Ill rtcw
-27-
"Collector'
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA1 INC.
dba CARMEL ARINA CORPORATION
Mark Arsenault
General Manager

CITY COUNCIL: Resolution Approving Street Closures, One of City's Free Use Days & Waiver of Costs and Fees Associated with 2012 Carmel Art and Film Festival


Meeting Date: August 7, 2012
Prepared by: Heidi Burch, Asst. City Administrator

City Council
Agenda Item Summary

Name: Consideration of a Resolution approving street closures, one of the City’s free use days and a waiver of certain costs and fees associated with the 2012 Carmel Art and Film Festival.

Description: The organizers of the Carmel Art and Film Festival have requested support from the City to waive certain fees and to grant one of the City’s “free use” days at Sunset Center.

Overall Cost:
City Funds: $3,130 plus one “free use” day valued at $2,000.
Grant Funds: N/A

Staff Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution to waive certain fees totaling $3,130.00 including those for special event processing, sound permits, parking stall fees, the use of Devendorf Park for two days, the closure of Mission Street from Ocean to 6th (provided sponsors are found) and one “free use” day at Sunset Center.

Important Considerations: Noted in the staff report.

Decision Record: In past years, the City Council has supported the Carmel Art and Film Festival by approving the “free use” day at the Sunset Center, the closure of Mission Street and the use of Devendorf Park.

Reviewed by:

_______________________________ __________________
Jason Stilwell, City Administrator Date


CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
STAFF REPORT

TO: MAYOR BURNETT AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: HEIDI BURCH, ASSIST ANT CITY ADMINISTRATOR
THROUGH: JASON STILLWELL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: AUGUST 7, 2012
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING STREET CLOSURES, ONE OF THE CITY'S FREE USE DAYS AND A WAIVER OF CERTAIN COSTS AND FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE 2012 CARMEL ART AND FILM FESTIVAL

BACKGROUND
2012 marks the fourth annual Carmel Art & Film Festival, scheduled for October 10-14th. The festival includes events such as the screening of films at venues throughout the City, a lecture series, a "Women in Film" program, a photography exhibit, and an art show and sale in Devendorf Park.

The event brings a large number of visitors to the City. The organizers offer daily tickets
as well as packages ranging in price from $10 to $25,000, making the experience
accessible to a wide array of filmgoers. Additionally, the movies on the beach and the art
show/sale in the park are free to the public.
In continuation of the organizers' commitment to the future of filmmaking, they have
established the Carmel Art & Film Festival Scholarship Fund, which offers four $2,500
scholarships to high school seniors who are planning on going to college to study art or
film, and/or college students already enrolled in art or film programs. As in years past,
student films will be shown in various venues.
The organizers of the Cannel Art and Film Festival have requested support for the event
from the City in various forms the past three years.
This year, the requests of the City are as follows:
Request #1 The closure of Mission Street between Ocean Avenue and Sixth Avenue for
the placement of tents to sell sponsor merchandise.
Carmel Municipal Code Section 12.32.060 requires that City Council approve the closure
of streets and the placement of tents in the public right-of-way for events. This has not
posed problems or generated complaints at similar events held in the City in recent years.

As of August 1, no event sponsors have been confirmed. This request is being made in
anticipation of the procurement of sponsors; however, if none are found within 30 day of
the event, the street will not be closed. Event organizers will confirm sponsors with City
staff 30 days prior to the event.
The request for the street closure has been granted to the organizers each year for the past
three years.
Request #2 One of the City's "free use" days at the Sunset Center for use between
October 10-14,2012.
The City is granted five "free use" days for the use of the theater and lobby of the Sunset
Center each fiscal year. Council has already approved two of these days: one, for the
Carmel Foundation; the other for the Carmel Public Library Foundation. At the August
7, 2012 meeting, Council will consider a request for a free day from the Carmel Authors
and Ideas Festival. Should Council approve both the requests from the Authors and Ideas
Festival and the Art and Film Festival, only one "free use" day will remain for the City
Council to allocate between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013.
This "free use day" request has been granted the previous three years for the Art and Film
Festival.
Request #3 Waiver of all allowable City fees totaling $3130.00.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impacts for the waiver requests are delineated below:
The use of Devendorf Park $1,400
Cost of $400 for the first four hours and $300 for the second four hours for two days.
This fee includes the cost of Public Works' time to inspect the park before and after for
damage, the posting and removal of signage, the placement and removal of barricades
and/or A-frames by the Public Works department.
The closure of Mission between Ocean and Sixth $730
Cost of $365 per block per day for two days. This fee includes the cost of traffic control
by the Police Department, the posting and removal of signage, the placement and
removal of barricades and or A-frames by the Public Works department
City event processing, sound permit and parking stall fees $1,000
100
Sunset Center free use day value of $2,000
This is not a direct cost to the City. The City has five "free use" days for use of the
theater and lobby of the Sunset Center each year. The value is provided here for
reference only.
The Carmel Art and Film Festival organizers have agreed to pay the City for the "hard
cost" expenses associated with the event in accordance with Council Policy.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION


Staff recommends that the Council waive the following fees totaling $3130.00:


Special event processing fee for the main event $ 150.00
Special event processing fee for the beach BBQ 400.00
Fees for two parking stalls 400.00
Sound pennit fees 50.00
Use of Devendorf Park 1,400.00
Closure of Mission Street (between 6th and Ocean) 730.00
Total $ 3,130.00
One day at Sunset Center value of $2,000.00

In accordance with Council Policy regarding the waiver of fees, the organizers have
provided the financial statements for 2011 and budget for the 2012 event for Council
consideration (Attachment "A").
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION 2012-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA APPROVING STREET CLOSURES, ONE OF THE
CITY’S FREE USE DAYS AND A WAIVER OF CERTAIN COSTS AND FEES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE 2012 CARMEL ART AND FILM FESTIVAL
WHEREAS, the Carmel Art and Film Festival, now in its fourth year, draws a
large number of visitors to the City and has proven to be a popular event; and
WHEREAS, the Festival offers a broad array of films and art events in a variety
of venues throughout the City, many of which are free to public; and
WHEREAS, the event organizers are committed to developing youth talent in
filmmaking, including offering $10,000 in scholarships to promising high school and
college students.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA DOES:
1. Approve waiving fees and costs to the 2012 Carmel Art and Film Festival to
include: the closure of Mission Street between Ocean and Sixth Avenue, one
“free use” day for the use of the theater and lobby at Sunset Center, and the
waiver of City permit and parking stall fees.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA this 7th day of August 2012, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
ATTEST: _______________________
JASON BURNETT, MAYOR
_____________________
Heidi Burch, City Clerk
101
The Carmel Art & Film Festival is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization dedicated to the development and
celebration of independent artists and their audiences.
This year the Carmel Art & Film Festival will take place October 10-14 at several venue locations
throughout Carmel-by-the-Sea. Last year the city supported our efforts by waiving all fees associated
with the film festival. Not only was this greatly appreciated, the cost savings allowed us to reallocate
dollars and expand our marketing efforts in both the LA and San Francisco areas which had a significant
impact on the ticket sales.
Listed below are all of the line items that appear on the Special Event Permit, however, we understand
that the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea has implemented new guidelines regarding the waiver of fees and is
no longer in a position to absorb the “hard cost” associated with a special event. Any “hard cost” line
item will be paid by Carmel Art & Film Festival:
1. One “FreeUse Day” at the Sunset Center for the use of the theater and lobby only
2. Special Event processing fee for the Carmel Art & Film Festival: $150
3. Special Event processing fee for the BBQ on the beach: $400
4. Beach Damage Deposit for BBQ (refundable upon inspection): $200
5. Devendorf Park - $400 1st four hours X 2 (use of park Saturday & Sunday only): $800
6. Devendorf Park - 2nd four hours$300 per hours X 2 (use of park Saturday & Sunday only): $600
7. Devendorf Park Damage Deposit: $350
8. Sound permit for Devendorf Park: $25
9. Sound permit for the “Movie on the Beach”: $25
10. ** Closure of Mission Ave. between 6th & Ocean Ave.: $730
11. ** No Parking signs ($1.50 per sign X 20 signs): $30
12. ** Long Barricades to close Mission between 6th and Ocean Ave.: $130
13. A-frames at various city locations: $250
14. Del Mar Beach, 2 officers, Saturday, October 13th from 5:00pm-11:00pm: $750
(2 X $103.62 per hour per officer. 12 hours total)
15. Two Parking stalls (location TBD) $100 per stall per day x 2 days: $400
** The request to close Mission Avenue is contingent on our ability to secure a Sponsor for this area and
we have agreed to a 30 day notice:
If the Carmel Art & Film Festival does not secure a Sponsor for the Mission Avenue street
closure 30 days prior to the film festival, the request will be withdrawn.
102
Attachment "A" 103
Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
Sponsorship Presence
Art Auction - Donation
Board Member Dues
Major Donor Contribution
Grants-Institutions
Product-Merchandise Sales
Print Sales
Ticket Sales
Patron Package
VIP Package
Essential Credential Package
Single Ticket
Women in Film
Advertising Sales
Artist Booth FeesNendors
Artist Application Fees
Film Submission Fees
Revenue Income-Other
Total Income:
Expense
Advertising
Print Media
Bill Board
TV-KSBW
Social Media
Web Design
Advertising - Other
Total Advertising
Automobile Expense
Bank Service Charges
Credit Card Service Charge
Total Bank Service Charges
Staffing & Commissions
PR Firms-LA & SC Live
Advertising Commission
Sponsorship Commission
Carmel Art Film Festival
January-December, 2012
Confidential
Planned
Jan- Dec 12
75,000
10,000
20,000
75,000
5,000
50,000
14,850
37,500
5,000
6,250
5,000
500
9,975
4,500
318,575
1,500
5,000
2,000
500
1,500
10,500
500
4,500
4,500
17,000
500
18,750
Page 1 of 3
104
Total Salary & Commissions
Event & Exhibition Expenses
Artist-Art Sales
Filmmaker Awards
Food & Beverage
Screenwriter Cash Award
Total
Insurance
Liability Insurance
Insurance-Board of Directors
Insurance-Event
Total Insurance
Licenses and Permits
Product-Merchandise
Music Performance
Total
Printing Cost
Program Printing
Banner & Signage
Collateral
Printing-Other
Total Printing Cost
Rentals
Film-Screening Rentals
Projection & Audio Rental
Theater Rental
Rentals - Other
Total Rentals
Security Expense
Transportation & Room Expense
Event & Exhibition Expenses -Other
Total
Total Event & Exhibition Expenses
Filing Fees
IMDb Monthly Fees
Carmel Art Film Festival
January-December, 2012
Confidential
Jan- Dec 12
36,250
3,500
65,000
5,000
73,500
950
3,150
2,500
6,600
750
2,000
500
3,250
15,000
4,500
3,000
6,000
28,500
15,000
24,000
39,000
1,000
35,000
5,000
41 ,000
237,100
300
180
Page 2 of 3
105
Constant Contact Monthly Fees
Office Supplies
Postage & Delivery
Rent
Car Insurance
Miscellaneous Expense
Total
Taxes
Sales
Total Taxes
Travel & Ent
Airfare-Internal
Catering/Event/Private Parties
Travel & Ent - Other
Total Travel & Ent
Utilities
Waste & Recycling
Telephone
Total Utilities
Total Expenses before Executive Compensation
Net Income before Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation
Net Income
Carmel Art Film Festival
January-December, 2012
Confidential
Jan- Dec 12
600
650
1,450
500
9,680
1,500
1,500
800
200
1,000
500
4750
5250
254,530
64,045
28,000
36,045.00
Page 3 of 3
106
Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
Sponsorship Presence
Art Auction - Donation
Board Member Dues
Major Donor Contribution
Grants-Institutions
Product-Merchandise Sales
Print Sales
Ticket Sales
Patron Package
VIP Package
Essential Credential Package
Single Ticket
Women in Film
Advertising Sales
Artist Booth FeesNendors
Artist Application Fees
Film Submission Fees
Revenue Income-Other
Total Income:
Expense
Advertising
Print Media
Bill Board
TV-KSBW
Social Media
Web Design
Advertising- Other
Total Advertising
Automobile Expense
Bank Service Charges
Credit Card Service Charge
Total Bank Service Charges
Staffing & Commissions
Staff Support
Advertising Commission
Sponsorship Commission
Total Salary & Commissions
Event & Exhibition Expenses
Artist-Art Sales
Filmmaker Awards
Carmel Art Film Festival
Financial Statement
Jan-Dec 2011
Previous
Jan- Dec 11
39,050
2,203
350
36,200
10,000
2,660
65,494
5,500
4,445
55
3,839
7,400
177,196
1,767
1,357
1,357
2,730
5,854
2,835
386
5,511
5,897
1,200
1,262
2,462
3,584
7/10/2012 1
107 Carmel Art Film Festival
Financial Statement
Jan-Dec 2011
Food & Beverage
Screenwriter Cash Award
Total
Insurance
Liability Insurance
Insurance-Board of Dire<
Insurance-Event
Total Insurance
Licenses and Permits
Product-Merchandise
Music Performance
Total
Printing Cost
Program Printing
Banner & Signage
Collateral
Printing-Other
Total Printing Cost
Rentals
Film-Screening Rentals
Projection & Audio Rent
Theater Rental
Rentals - Other
34,889
38,472
785
785
401
6,963
4,581
11,945
12,170
1,271
26,395
3,014
2,635
Total Rentals 33,315
Security Expense 250
Transportation & Room Expense 9,412
Event & Exhibition Expenses - Other 8,162 ------- Total 17,824
Total Event & Exhibition Expenses 128,724
Filing Fees 250
IMDb Monthly Fees 180
Constant Contact Monthly Fees 600
Office Supplies 697
Postage & Delivery
Rent
Car Insurance
Miscellaneous Expense
Total
Taxes
Sales
Total Taxes
Travel & Ent
9,000
10,727
5,296
5,296
7/10/2012 2
108
Airfare-Internal
Catering/Event/Private Parties
Travel & Ent - Other
Total Travel & Ent
Utilities
Carmel Art Film Festival
Financial Statement
Jan-Dec 2011
811
200
1 ,011
Waste & Recycling 400
Telephone 4,504
Total Utilities 4,904
Total Expenses before Executive Compensation- ----15-0,66-2 Net Income before Executive Compensation 26,534
Executive Compensation
Net Income 26,534
7/10/2012 3
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY SERVICES
PO BOX CC
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA, CALIFORNIA 93921
Phone: 831/620.2020 Fax: 831/624.2132
E-Mail: srana@ci.carmel.ca.us
clopez@ci.carmel.ca.us
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
TYPE OF EVENT

CITY COUNCIL: Appeal of Forest & Beach Commission's Denial of Application for Tree Removal at Residence on Torres Street, 2 SE Fifth Avenue



Meeting Date: August 7, 2012
Prepared by: Mike Branson


City Council
Agenda Item Summary

Name: Consideration of an appeal of the Forest and Beach Commission's denial of an application for tree removal at a residence on Torres Street, 2 SE of Fifth Avenue. The appellant is Marcia Stuart, on behalf of property owners Ann and Steve Kenfield.

Description: During its regular meeting of 5 July 2012, the Forest and Beach Commission denied (3-1) an application by Ms. Marcia Stuart for Mr. and Mrs. Kenfield, to remove a 30-inch diameter Monterey pine causing an unsafe condition and driveway damage on the Kenfield property on Torres Street, 2 SE of Fifth A venue. The Commission recommended the applicant selectively prune the offending roots in an appropriate manner and with professional guidance. An appeal of the decision was filed by Ms. Stuart on July 13.

Overall Cost: N/ A

Staff Recommendation: Deny the appeal and uphold the decision ofthe Forest and Beach Commission.

Important Considerations: The Forest and Beach Commission visited the site twice, at both its June and July meetings. The June visit allowed the Commissioners to view the driveway problems of concern to the applicant. In July, the applicant lifted the driveway pavers lifted so the Commissioners could see the root structure in the affected areas. After the Commission decision to deny the application, staff met with the applicant, her arborist, and two workers who will repair the driveway. Staff identified some of the roots that could be pruned or removed to achieve a usable and safe driveway. No large structural roots were identified for removal. Slight modifications to the driveway grade and adjustments to the irrigation regimen near the driveway also were discussed as ways to potentially reduce a re-occurrence of the driveway problems.

Decision Record: None.
Reviewed by:

Jason Stilwell, City Administrator Date

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FOREST, PARKS, AND BEACH DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR BURNETT AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
THRU: JASON STILWELL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: MIKE BRANSON, CITY FORESTER
DATE: AUGUST 7, 2012
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE FOREST AND BEACH COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF A 30-INCH DIAMETER MONTEREY PINE AT A RESIDENCE ON THE EAST SIDE OF TORRES 2 SOUTH OF FIFTH AVENUE. THE APPELLANT IS MARCIA STUART, ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNERS ANN AND STEVE
KENFIELD.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Forest and Beach Commission.

BACKGROUND
During its regular meeting of 5 July 2012, the Forest and Beach Commission denied
(3-1) an application by Ms. Marcia Stuart for Mr. and Mrs. Kenfield, to remove a 30-
inch diameter Monterey pine causing an unsafe condition and driveway damage on the
Kenfield property located on the east side of Torres Street, 2 south of Fifth Avenue.
The Commission recommended the applicant selectively prune the offending roots in
an appropriate manner and with professional guidance. An appeal of the July 5
decision was filed by Ms. Stuart on July 13, 2012.
The Commissioners toured and discussed the application during their June and July
regular meetings. In June, commissioners viewed driveway problems the applicant is
concerned about. In July, the applicant lifted the driveway pavers, which allowed the
Commissioners to see the root structure in the affected areas.
115
REVIEW
This property was renovated in 2003/2004 and the driveway area was changed from a
dirt surface to a cobble paver surface. During the preliminary site assessment before
the renovation, staff identified the pine trees root structure in the driveway as an area
of concern that should be accommodated if the driveway was altered. Paver surfaces
are generally a good choice near trees since repairs can usually be made at a lower
cost and without any appearance that a repair was performed.
The driveway, which also serves as the parking area since there is no garage or
carport, is located along the south property line and varies in width from 8.5
feet to 10 feet wide. The narrowest section is located between the south
property line onto the base of the tree where large structural root emanate from
the trunk.
The application was submitted due to uplifting of several areas of the driveway
pavers which have created an undulating surface that is difficult and potentially
hazardous to walk on. Uplifting near the beginning of the driveway also
hinders access to the driveway with the owner’s sports car. The applicant also
informed the Commission that two persons have fallen as a result of the uneven
driveway surface.
In 2010, the property experienced a long-term water leak near the building that
was either caused or exacerbated by tree roots. Tree roots will grow in the
direction of detected water so it is difficult to determine if the roots initially
caused the leak or grew in response to detecting the water leak. The owners
indicate in their correspondence that there was little lifting of the pavers before
the water leak was discovered. It is plausible that some of the recent uplifting is
due to the roots growing faster in the area of the water leak.
An arborist retained by the applicant reviewed the site and suggested that most,
if not all, of the roots affecting the driveway must be removed to re-level the
driveway, which would create an unstable and hazardous tree. The arborist also
indicated the presence of some root decay that she attributes to the paver
installation on top of the roots.
Staff evaluated the exposed roots before and during the Commission hearing
and considers selective root pruning to be a viable option to tree removal.
Removal of some root sections and shaving off some of the “bumps” on the
upper surface of remaining roots will resolve the uplifting issue and retain all of
the large structural roots in the driveway area. No large structural roots would
be removed. Staff’s opinion is the decay that can be observed is a remnant from
cars driving directly on the roots when the driveway was dirt and does not
appear to be significantly affecting the root system.
116
The pavers nearest to the base of the trunk may be resting directly on the roots
and causing a growth response from the tree. After root pruning, working with
the driveway grade when replacing the pavers may provide a little separation
between the pavers and the roots.
On July 9, staff met on site with the applicant, her arborist, and two persons that
will do the work. During that meeting, the root system was evaluated and steps
outlined on how to perform the root pruning and possible driveway grade
adjustments. It also was discussed to evaluate the landscape irrigation near the
tree and driveway to keep water away from the driveway as a way to discourage
the growth of small feeder roots beneath the paver surface.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
SUMMARY
The Forest and Beach Commission visited the site twice, heard public
testimony, discussed the issues, and denied the application to remove the
Monterey pine tree by a 3-1 vote. The majority opinion of the Commission was
that the tree is healthy and some selective root pruning could be done to achieve
a usable and safe driveway without removing the tree. The root pruning should
be coordinated with the City Forester and performed in an appropriate manner.
117
118
HAND DELIVERED
Carmel City Council
City Hall
Carmel-by-the-Sea, California
August 7, 2012
RE: Appeal of Forest and Beach Commission Action (Kenfield)
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
This appeal is from a decision of the Forest and Beach Commission denying our
application to remove a 37" diameter Monterey Pine located in the center of our property on
Torres Street, 2 SE St~ Avenue.
In August of 2010 roots from this tree caused the water main serving our house to break
near the house foundation. We were out of town at the time the main broke. By the time the
break was discovered, the foundation of the house was flooded. The attached pictures show the
damage that resulted to repair the water main break.
Roots from this tree have uplifted the pavers in our driveway causing a hazardous
condition and rendering the driveway inaccessible. In December of 2011, I tripped on an
uplifted paver and fell to the ground. The fall resulted in injury to my neck and shoulder which
required medical attention and ongoing physical therapy. That same month, my mother tripped
on another uplifted driveway paver and fell to the ground suffering cuts and bruises.
As a result of these injuries and accelerating property damage, we made application for
permission to remove this tree on May 24, 2012. The Forester prepared a memorandum to the
commission May 315
t. At the June 5, 2012 meeting of the Forest and Beach Commission, our
neighbor to the south spoke in support of our application. Our neighbor is concerned by the risk
to their own safety as well as the risk to their property posed by the tree. During the meeting
the Forester stated the diameter of the tree at 30" and of approximately 60 years of age. At the
conclusion of the hearing, the Commission acted to follow the recommendation of the City
Forester staff to continue the hearing to July sth , where we were asked to remove the pavers
and expose the roots prior to the July st~ hearing. The purpose of this request was so that "the
roots can be seen and appraised as to their significance".
The driveway pavers were removed on June 23, 2012 and the roots excavated on June
30t~. In his report dated June 28, 2012 (copy attached), the City Forester reported:
"The tree appears to be without any significant factors that necessitate removal of the
tree at the current time except the damage described by the applicant. The cobbles
have been removed in the areas with visible uplifting to expose the roots causing the
problems. I think that many of the offending roots or potions [sic] of the roots can be
removed to allow safe use of the driveway and still retain the tree. This procedure may
119
be a reoccurring practice as the tree continues to grow, but this is a valuable tree and
deserving of retention."
The City Forester recommended that the application to remove the tree be denied.
On July 2nd in preparation for the July sth hearing, after the City Forester had prepared
his report to the Forest and Beach Commission, both the excavated roots and the tree were
inspected by Maureen Hamb, a Certified Arborist. In her written report dated July 2, 2012 (copy
attached) she reported the diameter of the tree to be 37.2" and commented:
"All exposed roots have either damage or decay visible on the surface. Either the
pressure against the paved surface or the installation impacts have removed the
protective covering allowing decay to develop. Brown rot (characterized by brown dry
crumbly wood) was found on several roots."
Given the location and present 15.6Q slope of the driveway, exceeding the City Code by 50%,
Ms. Hamb concludes there are no solutions available that will allow the preservation of the
tree.
In the July sth hearing the Commission found in favor of the Forester's opinion and denied our
request.
With due respect for the Forester's, we hold that his opinion offered to the Commission in this
request is inconsistent with the condition of the tree, the site, the opinions of the Arborist,
noted experts, as well as the Forester's public comments and facts cited in a recent decision.
We believe the Forrester's observations and assessment may have been impacted by an
inaccurate measurement of the diameter of the tree and not having investigating the excavated
root condition and structure prior to reaching his opinion on June 281
h. The actual diameter of
the tree is 37.2" vs. the 30" reported by the Forester to the Commission. The expansive
presence of the root system in the driveway area and the presence of root rot were not known
at the time of the Forester's June 28th opinion to the Commission.
The findings of the arborist are consistent with an expert panel on Monterey Pine tree failure
(copy attached). The well document concerns for root rot, decay and fungi from cut root
surfaces, severing of support structure roots, uplifting of roots, tree maturity and soil
compaction are all contributors that increase the probability of total tree failure in this case.
Previous public comments and a recent opinion (copy attached) by the Forester are inconsistent
with the June 28th recommendation. In the Lopez Ave. Monterey Pine that fell in 2009, he
assessed the "nearly 40" diameter to be nearly a century old". The presence of root rot made
the Monterey Pine especially vulnerable to high winds even through the pine "was a robust,
healthy tree with no strong indications of root rot".
In a June decision, the Forester recommended the removal of 3 Monterey Pines due to decay
fungi entering through wounds. He stated decay fungi can over time weaken a trees vitality and
structural integrity. "One large, below ground, cut is a specific spot of concern of decay fungi
affecting the long term viability of these trees". In the McMills case, the close proximity of
120
several targets and the elevated risk due to root cutting lead the Forester to recommend these
trees to be removed.
Our home's location on Torres between sth and 6th poses a unique public safety risk. Our street
is one block off the time metered parking area and is heavily used by local merchants for day
time parking and the Carmel Fire Department for multiple days. Across the street, is the upper
parking lot for the Bay View Inn which is full many days of the year. The upper canopy of the
tree is heavily skewed to the prevailing wind, southwestern side of the tree. Should a nonprevailing
wind contribute to tree failure, the full time resident's home and the historic Hansel &
Gretel Comstock cottages would be crushed.
The continued cutting of the roots, as recommended by the Commission will exacerbate the
existing hazard to life and property. It is for these reasons that we stand by the Aborist's opinion
that removal of the tree is the only course of action that will not lead increase the incidence of
root decay resulting in total tree failure with potentially catastrophic results.
Respectively submitted,
Steve & Ann Kenfield
s~ /G~q/,
~~o
121
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
APPEAL OF FOREST & BEACH COMMISSION DECISION
(FILING FEE: $295.00*)
Appellant:
Property Owner: A~~ i ~E..'-1 E
)
\<_ p="p">Mailing Address: P 0. "Sox 54-\ C A.e_ i'<\E\.-
t-Jv..Q.C..\,b.... S-Tu~
Phones: Day:{Og\) 2<-//. ¢741
S\'Evening: ~ 5'1) tO I • 7 2. <.f <.J
Fax: ( ) Email: -;::,-n=_ \IE.'<:: .="." e.-="e.-" o..l::="o..l::" p="p" roc_cf="roc_cf">C'\'c4.roQ...snJAe: ~~ \. c~
Date Board heard the matter: ~'-'L't l5 , 2C>I2...-
Appeals to the City Council must be made in writing in the office of the City Clerk within
10 working days following the date of action by the Forest & Beach Commission and
paying the requiredfilingfee as established by City Council resolution.
Physical location of property that is the subject of appeal:
Lot(s): CoO Block: \ \q APN: 0\0- 09,2-- - O \ ~
COMMISSION ACTION BEING APPEALED:-----------
If you were NOT the original applicant or the applicant's representative, please state the
evidence that you are an aggrieved party: --------------
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
122
GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: (State the specific basis for your appeal, such as errors or
omissions you believe were committed by the Commission in reaching its decision, etc.)
\
A~~ ~\-\ Comro\:;;s\~ C>Ec.\~\o~
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE
AND CORRECT:
DATEDAT: c_,~ ~\\
~
$295.00 fee* re~ (Stafflnitial)
4~7oo
Receipt#:
ATTEST:
Heidi Burch, City Clerk
*Article 9, Section 7, of the Constitution of the State of California authorizes a city to
impose fees. Also see California government Code, Section 54344.
IMPORTANT: If the appellant wishes to submit materials for duplication and
inclusion in the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea's Council agenda packet, the materials must
be submitted to the City Clerk by working days after the decision of the
Commission. This matter is tentatively scheduled to be heard on C"1j . l 1 d-.0 ( d.,._
dmoK:Ierk/CownRECEIVED
JUL 13 2012
ClTY ot
CARMEL BY-THE-SEA
123
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
5 July 2012
Ms. Marcia Stuart
3775 Via Nona Maria
Carmel, CA 93923
FOREST AND BEACH DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX ·w
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA, CA 93921
(831) 620..2070 OFFICE
(831) 624-2132 FAX
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR TREE REMOVAL
E/ TORRES ST., 2 SOUTH OF 5TH AVE.
---- - - --- --c-AR:MEt:BY=THE=SnA:, CA ___ - --
Dear Ms. Stuart:
The Forest and Beach Commission considered your application for Mr. and Mrs. Kenfield to remove
one Monterey pine tree during their regular meeting of 5 July 2012.
In a 3-1 vote the Commission denied your application to remove the pine. The majority opinion of the
commission was, the tree is healthy and some selective root pruning can be done to achieve a usable
and safe driveway without removing the tree. The root pruning should be coordinated with the city
forester and performed in an appropriate manner.
Should you disagree with the decision of the Forest and Beach Commission, you have 10 days to
appeal their decision to the City Council. All appeals need to be filed with the City Clerk, Heidi Burch,
located at City Hall, east side of Monte Verde Street between Ocean and 7th A venues. The City Clerk
phone number is (831) 620-2000.
Sincerely, ! .
-- --- ~r~~- fB
Margi Perotti
--- ---------- - ---------
Secretary to the Forest and Beach Commission
124
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11faureeu Hamb-H 'CIS4 Certified Arbori\t JJ'£2280
Profenionul Consulting ..\, 'nTi<·es
July 2, 2012
Steve Kenfield
stevek@hmcfarms.com
Introduction
As you requested I have inspected and evaluated the root system of the Monterey
pine (Pinus radiata) growing at your residence at Torres near 5th in Carmel-by-theSea.
In August of 2010 I visited the site following the breakage of a water line. The area
was opened for inspection and root development was found to be responsible for
the damage. At that time it appeared that the driveway pavers were slightly raised
in several areas adjacent to the tree.
Since that time the pavers have been significantly displaced and cracks on the
walkway on the opposite side of the tree has widened. Cracks in the asphalt at the
driveway threshold have widened and the surface raised.
To fully examine the roots and evaluate the feasibility of root pruning the pavers
have been removed and the root system exposed. I have examined, measured and
evaluated the viability of the roots. My observations and recommendations are
included in this report.
Summary
Driveway pavers covering structural roots of a mature Monterey pine have been
removed to allow for a detailed inspection. I measured and evaluated the condition
of the roots to determine if root pruning is a feasible solution to eliminating damage
to the driveway.
An extensive web of large woody roots that range in size from one to nine inches in
diameter are located just under the pavers, three can be traced directly to the
buttress (base) of the tree. The surface of the roots has been damaged either during
the initial installation or by contact with the pavers; decay is present in several
areas.
Most, if not all the roots examined must be removed to re-install the paved surface.
If the roots remain in place and the pavers are replaced the damage to the roots will
continue and eventually they will become non functional and discontinue to support
the tree.
The required root removal will eliminate the anchoring capabilities by 50% causing
destabilization that will lead to whole tree failure.
849 Almar . h•e. Suite C #319
S(lnfa Cru:.. C t 95060
email: JmtureNwlrra sbc~lohalnet
Tcleplume: 831-763-69/9
Fax: 831-763-7724
-Hohile· 831-2U-i735
125 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -II
-
I
I
The removal of the tree is recommended; no other permanent solution is available
to allow a paved surface in this area.
Observations
The tree is a mature Monterey pine with a trunk diameter of 37.2 inches measured
at a point 54 inches above natural grade. The single trunk supports a canopy of well
spaced branching and healthy foliage.
The base (buttress) of the tree swells in all directions, these areas typically indicate
the presence of a large supporting root.
The driveway surface along one side of the tree consists of pavers set on a sub base
of sand type material. The opposite side of the tree is a small planting area and a
walkway 24 inches from the base of the tree. The walkway and step are stone set in
concrete. Damage that consists of cracks and raised areas are visible on the walkway
and stair.
The pavers were removed and the sand and soil sub-grade material excavated to
fully expose the structural roots. The size of the larger roots was determined using a
diameter tape. I completed a visual inspection of all roots to evaluate condition.
The largest root is 9.8 inches in diameter and can be traced directed to the base
(buttress) of the tree. Several other large roots that range from 6 to 8 inches can
also be traced back to the buttress (pictured below). Root diameter remains
consistent in areas more than 10 feet from the tree. Smaller diameter roots create a
web that crisscross along the soil surface.
126 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
All exposed roots have either damage or decay visible on the surface. Either the
pressure against the paved surface or the installation impacts have removed the
protective covering allowing decay to develop. Brown rot (characterized by brown
dry crumbly wood) was found on several roots.
Examination of roots under the paved walkway and stair was not possible. It can be
assumed that when the installation was completed roots were removed, cut or
damaged.
Discussion
Trees develop and depend upon two types of root structures to both provide
moisture and nutrients to the above ground portions of tree and to anchor it in the
growing site. The absorbing root layer is a network of small diameter fibrous roots
that are responsible for transport and the larger woody roots are responsible for
keeping the tree standing upright.
The healthy appearance of the tree canopy is related to the functions of the
absorbing root system. The degraded and damaged condition of the supporting
roots is not expressed in the tree canopy. Although the tree is healthy, it is
structurally unstable due to the compromised root system.
Conclusion/Recommendations
The paver system used as a driveway was installed directly on the structural root
system that anchors the tree in its growing site. Continued root development and
degradation of the sub-grade material has caused damage and the resulting decay
that will compromise root functions.
Installing a new surface will require the removal of large roots that are connected to
the buttress of the tree. The removal of these roots will lead to destabilization and
tree failure.
There are no solutions available that will allow the preservation of the tree. I
recommended removal and planting of a replacement tree appropriate to the site.
Please call my office with any questions regarding the Monterey pine on this
property.
Respectfully,
Maureen Hamb-Certified Arborist WE2280
127 I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
July 5, 2012
To: Carmel Forester and Committee
We are requesting permission to remove a mature, 38" diameter Monterey Pine on our
property. The tree has shown symptoms of very rapid root uplifting that has rendered our
driveway in accessible. The uneven driveway has caused several people to trip on raised
pavers and the broke of the house's water main in August 2010. Our concern is for our
current and future property damage, access to our driveway for our vehicles, the personal
safety of those on our property, public safety and subsequent property damage should the
tree fall down. The Committee visited the site on June 12th and asked that the pavers be
removed to observe the position and condition of the root. The following pictures show
that rate of uplifting the tree has shown over the last 21 months and the current position
of the root system. Maureen Hamb, a professional arborist has submitted a report to Mike
Branson on the condition of the tree given the circumstances.
June 2012
128
129 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I June 2012
I
II
II
'
August 2010
130 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 2012 Rate of elevation change
I
I
I
-II
II
II August 2010
I
I
131
I
I
June 2012
132 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I August 201 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
133 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 2012
134 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I June 2012
I
I
I
I
135 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 2012
136 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 2012
137 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 2012
The uplifting of the roots headed for the southwest comer of the house caused the water
main leading to the house to break in August of2010. At that time the uplifting ofthe~e
pavers was barely noticeable. The water from the broken main was undetected for an ·
unknown number of days as the house was not owners were out of a town for several
weeks. The water was noticed coming out from under the foundation and a 12" waterline
on the foundation is still visible. The planter retaining was had to be removed to gain
access to the water main. Pressure on the line was released with an elbow that was put in
at the time of the repair. Since that time the evidence of the up lifting of the root that
caused the initial damage is now very pronounced. We are very concerned of a repeat of
the broken water main, subsequent flooding if the owners are out of town and the repairs
that would be required. The picture below is a view of the uplifted pavers over the water
mam.
138 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, August 2010
139 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
140 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 2012
141 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 2012
As shown in the above pictures, there is significant root presence at the surface of the top
soil that have been uplifting the driveway pavers
Out of compliance with Municipal Codes:
The root uplifting has resulted in our driveway to be inaccessible for access to the home
and parking of two vehicles. As a result we are parking on the heavily congested street on
Torres between 5th and 6th. In addition to the inconvenience, we are currently in violation
of Carmel by the Sea Municipal Code Chapter 17.38 for off street parking as a result of
not being able to use our driveway. The Chapter sites the following; "The purpose of this
chapter is to require off-street parking for vehicles to lessen the parking congestion on the
public streets and to leave street parking for available for persons making short term
visits to the commercial district for shopping, business or other related activities." Clearly
142 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the location ofthe home is in the prime parking demand area. The code section 17.38.020
C addresses the minimum off.street parking: "When any determination of the minimum
required parking for a project or use results in a need for only one space, and parking is
being physically provided off·street, two full spaces shall be required unless the applicant
can demonstrate a reconfiguration of on·street spaces, consistent with guidelines
maintained by the Department of Public Works for street parking, that yields a net gain in
total available parking when only one off.street space is provided". Section 17.38.020 E
Design Standards: The following standards shall apply for all surface and underground
parking designs:
1. Dimensions: Standard space 9'x19' for a total driveway space of9'
X 38'.
n. Driveways: Driveways shall be located to preserve as much ofthe
on·street parking as possible.
The municipal also addresses the maximum slope of the driveway. The slope of the current
driveway is 15.8° within the first 5' of the driveway. This is significantly greater than the 10° called
for in Municipal Code:
12.24.020 Permit- Conditions.
No permit shall be issued under CMC 12.24.010 unless the proposed alteration or project
complies with the following:
A. The maximum width of any driveway shall not exceed 14 feet as measured at the front
property line or at any point between the front property line and its connection with the street
pavement edge. A flare of a 30-inch radius shall be allowed at each side of the driveway at the
street pavement edge connection. There shall be a short return of asphalt material at the street
connection for transition of street to driveway. The length of this return shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works.
I. No driveway shall be constructed upon the publicly-owned sidewalk area, park strip, right-ofway
area or street except in compliance with the permit issued by the City. Such permit shall
143 I
I
I
I
I
impose conditions consistent with standards for safety, drainage, utility and/or aesthetics and
shall state the ·grade level at which the driveway shall cross over an existing or future curb or
sidewalk. Where no curb and/or sidewalk is in existence at such grade, the permit may allow the
driveway surfacing to start at the edge of the present street surfacing and follow the existing
contours of the ground in the public right-of-way. The permit may allow cuts and fills on ly as may
be necessary for the property owner to gain access to his/her property. The grade of the sloped
portion of the access route measured along the centerline shall not exceed 1 0 percent in the first
and last five feet or 25 percent in the intervening distance. The driveway profile shall be
constructed so that vehicles can safely and conveniently traverse it and should provide a smooth
transition between grades. A transition shall be constructed utilizing a vertical curve of 30 feet or
longer where the change in grade is greater than five percent.
J. Where no official grade has been established or where the official grade has been established
and the existing driveway does not conform, a conditional permit may be granted for resurfacing
of the existing driveway at the existing grade.
Summary:
The very mature Monterey Pine is exhibiting rapid root uplifting of an extensive root
system at the surface of the ground. This has rendered the driveway in accessible and
very difficult of elderly family members to enter the house. The current root system poses
a continuing threat to the water main to the house that can be expected to cause repeat
damage resulting from a broken water main. The liability from further tripping injury and
potential catastrophic damage should the tree fall down given its age and the impact of
trimmed roots. It is for these reasons that we request permission to remove the tree and
replace the tree with another upper level tree on the property.
Respectively submitted,
Steve & Ann Kenfield
144
2010 Water main break:
Target Zone:
Historic Hansel & Gretel Comstock Cottages
Fu ll time resident's home
145
Patricia Perry
PO Box 1712
Carmel, CA 93921
August 1, 2012
Mayor and City Council Members
Carmel-by-the-Sea City Hall Monte Verde Street
P.O. Box CC
Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921
R~: pipe Tre~ 2 SE Torres ~ ~til Steve and Ann Keqfielq
j : 1 I
MY family has been Carmel-by-the-Sea residents since the 19 SO's. My children were
raised here and attended Carmel River and Middle Schools. Some of you may recall
my father, Frank Perry even ran for mayor in the 1990's. We all feel proud,
privileged, and concern for what is best for our little village. I believe that we, as
residents have a responsibility and civic duty to be involved retaining its unique
beauty. I like to say, I am "deeply rooted" here.
This letter is to address my concerns regarding the pine tree located in my
neighbor's front yard. Persevering trees is paramount enlue of larger buildings and
a "better view" under most circumstances. I believe this is instead, an issue of safety.
The tree has ruined our driveway with several deep cracks across. My guest and I
have· stumbled on them during the day and night. I am very concerned that trimming
the roots will create an even greater hazard by making the integrity of the tree itself
unstable. My house and bedroom is in direct line of this shallow rooted tree if it
should come down. I do not want this "hanging over my head" when I go to bed at
night. I ask you to please to protect us from possible physical danger.
Those of you whom may not know the front of the property presently has several
beautiful established. oak trees. I do not believe that the removal of the pine will
diminish the ecstatic value of our street what so ever.
Thank you for balancing the protection our town environment and residents. Thank
all of you for your time and consideration in this matter.
146
Volume 95 No. 15 On the Internet: www.carmelpinecone.com
Aprill0-16, 2009
Carmel man spared but car crushed by old pine
MoMENTS AFTER Lopez Avenue resident Peter Murray stepped from his Subaru Friday morning, a
gigantic Monterey pine smashed it to smithereens. The towering tree, which the Carmel forester said had
rotten roots making it especially vulnerable to the day's high winds, also significantly damaged Murray 's
new Mercedes and put some dents and scratches in a neighbor's Mercedes. "We're in quite a state of shock,
becauseit could have fallen on my wife or me. I had just been in the car," said Murray, who had sat in the
Subaru Legacy gathering paperwork and listening to a BBC broadcast for three or four minutes after
parking on the street. A few minutes after he went into his house, the tree fell with a loud whoosh and a
ground-shaking thud. "We're very happy that we're alive," he said. "Ifl had been in the car, I would have
had no chance. The tree just flattened it."
City forester Mike Branson said he believes the pine was on city property. and his investigation of the
roots, which were exposed when the tree pulled out of the ground, showed significant rot. Cuts in the
trunk also indicated some decay. "Part of the root system was significantly affected, and part of it still
looked pretty healthy," he said. When it was standing. the pine "was a robust, healthy tree," with no
strong indications of root rot. It was also covered by ivy, which could have hidden any outward signs.
''It was one of those trees that's difficult to make a positive assessment on," Branson said. He estimated the
pine was about a century old and about 85 feet tall and nearly 40 inches in diameter. He is looking at some
other trees in the area to which the neighbors have brought to his attention. "We love Carmel- it's a
lovely city," Murray commented. "It does have trees, and that makes it an even prettier city, but we are
concerned with them. A car or two can be replaced, but our concerns are our lives and our neighbors'
lives, and after that, our houses."
147
Uprooting of Monterey Pine in Burlingame, California
Date of Failure: February 2, 1997
Species: Pinus radiata
Age: approximately 80 years
Size: crown spread - 50 feet; height - 75 feet; DBH - 42 inches
Description. Last February, this large Monterey pine blew over during a strong wind storm in the city of
Burlingame, CA (approximately 15 miles south of San Francisco). Fortunately, no personal injuries or
property damage were sustained, but two nearby trees were severely damaged. Winds were gusty,
greater than 25 mph, and from an easterly direction (not the prevailing direction). The tree was located in
a relatively open area (adjacent trees were about one crown diameter away) of a municipal park with an
irrigated turf groundcover. Roots broke approximately 10 to 20 feet from the trunk and no decay was
noted. Most roots were confined to the surface 2 feet of soil, as can be noted from the root plate which
came out of the ground. The soil was moist in the root zone but dry below. The tree's canopy was
somewhat uneven with most branches growing in a westerly direction.
Assessment. This failure is thought to have resulted from a combination of t hree factors:
• strong winds from a non prevailing direction
• a shallow root system
• uneven weight distribution in the canopy
It is likely that wind load from the easterly direction was the most important factor. With westerly winds
being typical for the area, tree growth likely occurred in response to the prevailing winds. As such, root
system development may not have been sufficient to withstand large wind loads from the opposite
direction. Wind gustiness also likely played a contributing role, but it is difficult to assess its impact
relative to wind speed and direction. Canopy weight distribution and root system depth perhaps played a
lesser (albeit important) role in which the wind load added to the preexisting weight on the westerly side
of the tree and the shallow root system was less tolerant of the combined load relative to a more deeply
rooted system.
This failure falls into the "difficult to predict" category. A very thorough tree hazard assessment
likely would not identify "uprooting from non-prevailing winds" as the probable failure type for this tree.
There was very little evidence (eg. no wood decay, no sporophores, no lean, no uplifting of roots and soil,
etc.) to suggest that an uprooting event may occur. Although there may have been little to do to prevent
this failure (other than perhaps some canopy thinning), it underscores the importance of avoiding
activities which result in structural defects in the root zone, such as root cutting, overwatering, or soil
compaction. If an apparently sound root system fails under the circumstances described, th en one with
defects should have a higher potential for failure.
148
Narrative
Incident Review on the McMills Project
Tree root severing
May 31,2012
The McMills development is located on the west side of Santa Rita St., 2 north of Sixth Ave.
This residential project began design review in spring 2008 and was approved by the Design
Review Board in 2009. The site is a double lot proposed for a new 3,200 square-foot two-story
home which also includes a below grade living area (bonus area). A building permit was issued
in March 2011. Demolition of the old building, located primarily on the northern portion of the
property, occurred shortly after the issuance of the building permit. Construction of the new
home did not begin until2012.
The site slopes down from east to west with an average slope around 20%. There are 9 coast live
oaks and 6 Monterey pines on the property along with 3 oaks on the Santa Rita St. right-of-way.
All of the trees are to be retained on the property during and post construction. There is also a
large 38" diameter Monterey pine growing on the property to the north that partially straddles the
northern property line onto the McMills site.
Three pines located on the western side of the new home had several roots cut during excavation
for the foundation and perimeter walls of the lower level of the home. For discussion, they are
identified as pine #1, #2, and #3. Pine #1 is approximately 36" in diameter and 90 feet tall, pine
#2 is 24" in diameter and 102 feet tall, and pine #3 is 23" in diameter and 80 feet tall. Excavation
was approved for the site and the roots that were severed would have extended through the walls
into the living space of the lower level of the approved home. Pine# 1 had one large 14"
diameter root cut; this is the only significant root on the east side of this tree. The finished soil
cut near this tree is about 4 feet deep and about 3 feet from the base of the tree. Pines# 2 and #3
had 15 roots cut ranging from 2-6 inches in diameter. These two trees originate within two feet
of each other with an interlocking root system malcin.g it difficult to determine which root
belongs to which tree. It is probable that the trees may have a shared root system with root grafts
and a degree of reliance on one another for physical support. The soil cut near these trees is
about 4 feet deep on the east side of pine #2 and about 3 feet deep to the north of both trees. The
excavation is within 3 feet and 4 feet of the trees on the east and north respectfully.
A standard condition of issuance of a building pennit for construction is all excavation within 15
feet of a significant tree requires hand digging and contact with the City Forester if roots larger
that 2" are discovered. The contractor did not hand-dig in the area near the trees for the required
cut. The condition for hand digging is attached to the approved project plans when the building
permit is issued. When staff contacted the site foreman and excavation contractor, neither was
aware of the condition for hand digging near significant trees. The foreman works for McMills
Construction and had not worked in Carmel before. The excavation contractor is a relatively new
company that also had not worked around significant trees in Carmel before.
Conclusion
Three Monterey pines are affected by the root cutting incident. The trees appear to be stable at
the current time. However due to the extent their root systems have been compromised their
long-term retention is in doubt. Trees rely on their larger structural roots to provide support of
the above ground portions of the tree. While some root pruning can be accommodated if done
appropriately and with professional direction, the roots removed on these trees exceed what
would be acceptable for the size and location of the trees. Any wound whether above or below
ground is a potential entry point for decay fungi which can over time weaken a trees vitality and
149
structural integrity. The large below ground cut on tree #1 is a specific spot of concern for decay
fungi affecting the long-term viability of this tree.
With the close proximity of several targets (homes and people) and the elevated level of risk due
to the root cutting, these trees should be removed. Mediation of the root loss via thinning the
canopy, anchoring and guying with cables, or other means will not provide the level of risk
reduction for the safety of this property and neighboring properties into the future. The neighbor
to the west is very concerned about the long term viability of the three trees and the possibility
they may fall and hit his property. Other properties may not be aware of the situation but may
have similar concerns.
Staffhas recommended removal of the trees to the property owner and an application has been
submitted for a hearing by the Forest and Beach Commission. Staff is assessing a value to each
tree which the commission can require the property owner to pay for the damage and resulting
loss of the trees.
150
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Leverone, Chairperson
Members of the Forest and Beach Commission
FROM: Mike Branson, City Forester
DATE: 31 May2012
SUBJECT: Tree Removal (Private)
Block: 60 Lot: 6
E/ Torres St., 2 south of 5th Ave.
Applicant/Owner: Marcia Stuart I Stephen and Ann Kenfield
Site Condition:
This site is a level4000 square-foot lot with single-family home and cobble paver
driveway and parking pad along the southern property line at the front of the property.
The tree is located in the front yard of the property adjacent to the north edge of the 8' 6"
wide driveway/parking pad.
Size and species oftrees(s) requested for removal/pruning:
Remove one Monterey pine- 30" diameter.
Health and condition of tree requested for removal:
This appears to be healthy without any significant disease or structural problems. The
cobble parking area is placed right up to the base of the tree where trunk diameter
expands ( root collar) as the roots enter the ground. It appears that at time vehicles
actually drive over the root collar due to the narrowness of the parking pad near the tree.
Previous requests and decisions:
None.
Reason for request- Description of Proiect:
The applicant is concerned about roots lifting the pavers causing the driveway to be
dangerous and unusable, roots damaging their water service to the house, damage to the
house and car, and safety and liability of their family and guests.
-·---\~ ~/~ --·-
151
The importance of the tree{s) to the urban forest in the area:
The tree contributes to the upper canopy of the urban forest in this neighborhood.
Size and species oftree(s) that are to be preserved:
Coast live oak- 4", 15" multi-stem, 12" multi-stem, and 9" diameters
Monterey pine- 15" diameter
Japanese maple - 3" diameter
Impacts construction may have on trees that are to be preserved and suggested
mitigation:
N/A
Options:
1. Approve the application.
2. Do not approve the application.
3. Postpone consideration.
Staff Recommendations:
Option #3. Postpone consideration. The tree appears to be without any significant factors
that necessitate removal of the tree at the current time except for the damage described by
the applicant. The damage to the driveway/parking pad is obvious and in need of some
corrective action. I n order to make an informed decision about the size and extent of
roots that appear to be the cause of the uplifting I recommend asking the applicant to
arrange for the removal of the cobbles so the roots can be seen and appraised as to their
significance. At that time a determination can be made regarding removal or retention of
the tree.
If the application is approved, I recommend planting one upper canopy replacement tree
in the front yard of the site.
152
,..CIT.¥. OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
P.O. Box "SS"
Catmei,CA
Ph: (831) 620-2070/FAX: 831-624-2132
Date Received t:) ~~ 1.Application
Fee: $ '?J5 _.
Rccpt' 1-t 1172
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO REMOVE OR PRUNE TREES
NO CONSTRUCTION
Location of property; \"''R12.~ 2 ~E. c::tf e..h..
Block: kO Lot: ___.. ....._ _________.. ....___ __,__
\
ST>~&~Jt~w
Name of Property Owner: ,,:a.u=\Etl.t)
Mailing Address ~- 0 . :&x, '5'\ \
CA\2-IDE.L •, CA 5"&9 2.\
Phone#: 65'"\ • 7o7 · 7 2...4./<£
WHO WILL BE REMOVING/PRUNING TIIE TREE(S):
Name of Applicant/Contractor: MA'0:...1A. '!S\UA2.T
Mailing Address: .;115 '/, ,_, Na~ M.Ag,EPhone#:
~ · 21.£1 · 1/=7 PI
(PLEASE NOTE IF TREE(S) ARE ON CITY OR PRIVATE PROPERTY)
Number, size and species oftree(s) to be removed: ONB.. ~\\.:>12.E ~~S2t='f :P\b4E:..
Number, size and species of limbs to be removed:------------- - - -----
A SITE PLAN :MiJSt ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICA 110N AND SHOW THE FOLLOWING:
1. Location, size and species of ALL trees on the lot
2. Location and species oftree(s)/limb(s) to be removed or pruned
3. Footprint of the structure.
4. Location of areas for tree replanting-The City has adopted Desi~ Review Guidelines· which include a minimum
tree density per lot. Please review the attached Policy and indicate on the site plan where you intend to plant trees
necessary to comply with this guideline.
> Any decision of the Forest and Beach Commission is based on information submitted with this applicationPLEASE
BE ACCURATE.
> NO WORK IS PERM ITT EO until yo!f have picked up your permit for tree work - The Permit must be posted on the job site
when work is being performed. .
Owner'sSignatuie ~ . . Date: t;'{?-~/1'2.-
AgentforOwners: __ _ Date: 6{_idfrz.
INCO ETE APPLICAIYS WILL BE' RETURN D
.: fl
'- .
153
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Leverone, Chairperson
Members of the Forest and Beach Commission
FROM: Mike Branson, City Forester
DATE: 28 June 2012
SUBJECT: Tree Removal (Private)
Block: 60 Lot: 6
E/ Torres St., 2 south of 5th Ave.
Applicant/Owner: Marcia Stuart I Stephen and Ann Kenfield
Site Condition:
This site is a level4000 square-foot lot with single-family home and cobble paver
driveway and parking pad along the southern property line at the front of the property.
The tree is located in the front yard of the property adjacent to the north edge of the 8' 6"
wide driveway/parking pad.
Size and species of trees(s) requested for removal/pruning:
Remove one Monterey pine- 30" diameter.
Health and condition of tree requested for removal:
This appears to be healthy without any significant disease or structural problems. The
cobble parking area is placed right up to the base of the tree where trunk diameter
expands (root collar) as the roots enter the ground. It appears that at time vehicles
actually drive over the root collar due to the narrowness of the parking pad near the tree.
Previous requests and decisions:
None.
Reason for request- Description of Project:
The applicant is concerned about roots lifting the pavers causing the driveway to be
dangerous and unusable, roots damaging their water service to the house, damage to the
house and car, and safety and liability of their family and guests.

The importance of the tree(s) to the urban forest in the area:
The tree contributes to the upper canopy of the urban forest in this neighborhood.
Size and species oftree(s) that are to be preserved:
Coast live oak- 4", 15" multi-stem, 12" multi-stem, and 9" diameters
Monterey pine - 15" diameter
Japanese maple - 3" diameter
Impacts construction may have on trees that are to be preserved and suggested
mitigation:
N/A
Options:
I. Approve the application.
2. Do not approve the application.
3. Postpone consideration.
Staff Recommendations:
Option #2.Do not approve the application. The tree appears to be without any significant
factors that necessitate removal of the tree at the current time except for the damage
described by the applicant. The cobbles have been removed in the areas with visible
uplifting to expose the roots causing the problems. I think that many of the offending
roots or potions of the roots can be removed to allow safe use of the driveway and still
retain the tree. This procedure may be a reoccurring practice as the tree continues to grow,
but this is a valuable tree and deserving of retention.
If the application is approved, I recommend planting one upper canopy replacement tree
in the front yard of the site.

Labels