Meeting Date: July 1, 2008
Prepared by: Rich Guillen
City Council
Agenda Item Summary
Name: Second Reading of an Ordinance adding Chapter 3.36 to the Municipal Code
establishing a Regional Development Impact Fee
Description: At its August 2006 meeting, the Transportation Agency of Monterey
County (TAMC) initiated an update to the regional transportation impact fee.
TAMC approved an Investment Plan for Transportation Sales Taxes that was
distributed at the May 20, 2008 City Council Meeting. The City Council adopted
supporting resolutions to support the sales tax initiative. The attached ordinance
adds Chapter 3.36 “Regional Development Impact Fee” to the Municipal Code.
Overall Cost:
City Funds: $0
Grant Funds: $0
Staff Recommendation: Adopt the Ordinance as written.
Important Considerations: Fifty percent of the proposed sales tax funds will help
improve safety and reduce congestion along highways 1 and 101. An additional
25 percent will go to cities for local street maintenance. The remaining 25
percent will go towards alternative modes of transportation such as buses, bike
lanes, etc.
Decision Record: First reading of the proposed Ordinance was considered by Council at
its June 3, 2008 meeting. On May 20, 2008, three resolutions in support of the
sales tax initiative were approved at a Special City Council meeting.
Reviewed:
Rich Guillen, City Administrator Date
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 2008-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
ADDING CHAPTER 3.36 TO THE CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA MUNICIPAL CODE
ESTABLISHING A REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council finds that future development within the City
of Carmel-by-the-Sea to the year 2030 will result in degradation of traffic levels of service on the
regional transportation system of streets, arterials, and highways throughout the County of
Monterey; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council finds that failure to expand the capacity of the
existing circulation system as new development is approved will increase congestion on the
regional system, as documented in the Regional Development Impact Fee – Nexus Study Update
(the “Study”) approved by the board of the Transportation Agency of Monterey County
(“TAMC”) on January 16, 2008. TAMC commissioned the Study, which looks at, among other
matters, future development and the planned future road improvements needed to serve the new
development; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council finds and declares that the fair-share traffic
impact fee to be levied upon new development pursuant to this Chapter provides a mechanism to
fund new developments’ share of regional transportation system improvements that are needed to
mitigate congestion and related adverse impacts caused by the new development; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council finds that exactions from new development
are necessary to provide a portion of the funding for the construction of the regional
transportation improvements needed to accommodate traffic that will be generated by new
development of land within the county; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council finds that the Study has determined the extent
to which the new development of land will generate traffic volumes impacting the regional
transportation system and that this Chapter establishes a fair and equitable method for
distributing the unfunded costs of transportation improvements necessary to accommodate the
traffic volumes generated by such development; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council finds there is a reasonable relationship
between the use of the Regional Development Impact Fee to pay for the construction of the
Regional Transportation Improvement Projects and the type of development for which the
Regional Development Impact Fee is charged in that all new development in the County, both
residential and non-residential, will generate or contribute to the need for the Regional
Transportation Improvement Projects in different degrees as further described in the Study; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council finds that the cost estimates set forth in the
TAMC 2007 Regional Development Impact Nexus Fee Study Update are reasonable cost
estimates for constructing the Transportation Improvement Projects, and the Regional
Development Impact Fees expected to be generated by future development will not exceed the
projected costs of constructing the Transportation Improvement Projects; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council also finds that the fees collected pursuant to
this Chapter shall only be used to finance the Regional Transportation Improvement Projects.
The City adopts this ordinance with the expectation that a required minimum number of TAMC
member governing bodies will also adopt the Regional Development Impact Fee on a uniform
basis and that the County and these other TAMC members will use the fees collected in a
coordinated manner to provide for financing and construction of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Projects; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council has reviewed and considered the certified
Environmental Impact Report for the 2005 Monterey Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Plan
and Addendum thereto prepared by TAMC, the lead agency for the Regional Transportation
Impact Fee for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources
Code section 21000, et. Seq. The Council of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, as Responsible
Agency, has followed the process set forth in 14 Cal. Code of Regs 15096 and has made the
appropriate findings to certify the Environmental Impact Report for this Project; and
WHEREAS, the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council has authorized the execution and delivery of a
Joint Powers Agreement (“JPA”) establishing a Regional Development Impact Fee Agency
(“RDIF Agency”) to coordinate the activities of the parties to the JPA in connection with the
collection, transmittal and expenditure of Regional Development Impact Fees (as defined
herein).
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE SEA
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are adopted as findings of the City Council as though set
forth fully herein.
SECTION 2. Chapter 3.36, entitled “Regional Development Impact Fee”, shall be added to the
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code.
SECTION 3. Section 3.36.010 of the City of Carmel by the Sea Municipal Code, entitled
“Terms and Definitions”, shall be added to Chapter 3.36 as shown in bold, italic text as follows:
3.36.010 Terms and Definitions
As used in this Chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
A. “Applicant” means the person or entity applying for a tract map, parcel map, tentative
subdivision map, conditional use permit, land use permit, building permit or other land use
entitlement for a new development project and their successors and assigns.
B. “RDIF Agency” refers to the Monterey County Regional Development Impact Fee Joint
Powers Agency.
C. “Regional Development Impact Fee”, or “the Fee,” or “RDIF” refers to the fees approved
by the governing boards of the County and other TAMC members on new development within
their respective jurisdictions and transmitted to the RDIF Agency as provided in the JPA. The
project list for the Regional Development Impact Fee is in Exhibit “B” of the JPA.
D. “Regional Transportation Improvement Projects,” or “Projects” refers to those public
improvements required to mitigate the regional impacts of new development on the roads,
highways and arterials within the county as specified in Section 16-5.
SECTION 4. Section 3.36.020 of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code, entitled
“Establishment of a Regional Fee”, shall be added to Chapter 3.36 as shown in bold, italic text as
follows:
3.36.020 Establishment of a Regional Impact Fee
A. The Regional Development Impact Fee is hereby established in the amounts specified in a
resolution to be adopted by the Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council for the purpose of paying for
Regional Transportation Improvement Projects identified in Exhibit “B” of the JPA needed to
meet increased demand created by traffic resulting from new development. The revenues
raised from the impact fee shall be remitted to the RDIF Agency to be held, maintained, used
and accounted for as required in Government Code section 66006 of the Mitigation Fee Act in
a coordinated fashion, as provided in the JPA.
B. The Regional Development Impact Fee shall be automatically adjusted as of July 1 of each
year following the first year after the effective date of this Chapter. The adjustment shall be
calculated by TAMC as administrator of the RDIF Agency, based on the increase or decrease
in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for the San Francisco Bay Area for
the period ending December 31 of the preceding calendar year.
C. In addition to the automatic adjustment set forth above, TAMC may recommend to the
County and other TAMC members that the Regional Development Impact Fee be increased to
reflect revisions to the project list in the Monterey County Regional Transportation Plan,
program revenue, increases in land values over the inflationary increase, or other factors.
D. Except as provided in Government Code sections 65961, 66474.2 and 66498.1 or as
otherwise provided by state or federal law or the exemptions set forth in Section 16-3 below, no
tract map, parcel map, tentative subdivision map, conditional use permit, land use permit,
building permit or other land use entitlement for a new development project shall be approved
or issued unless payment of the fee is a condition of approval for any such entitlement. Prior
to issuance of a building permit or at such other time as required by law, the City shall require
the applicant to pay the Fee.
E. Impact fees shall be imposed and collected by the City and, along with any interest earned
on the Fees while in the possession of the City, shall be transmitted by the City to the RDIF
Agency on the first day of each month for all Fees collected during the prior month. The Fees
shall be placed by the RDIF Agency in the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Trust Fund.
All interest or other earnings of the Fund shall be credited to the Fund.
SECTION 5. Section 3.36.030 of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code, entitled
“Exemptions”, shall be added to Chapter 3.36 as shown in bold, italic text as follows:
3.36.30 Exemptions
In addition to any exemptions from the levy of development impact fees provided by law,
including, as applicable, the levy of development impact fees which are the subject of a vested
subdivision map, the following development projects are exempt from payment of the fee
required by this Chapter:
A. The reconstruction of any building so long as the reconstructed building both continues a
use of the same category as the prior use and generates the same or fewer trips as the original
building and reconstruction commences and so long as the permit for reconstruction is issued
within one (1) year from destruction of the building.
B. Development within the Fort Ord Reuse Agency (“FORA”) area that is subject to
transportation improvement fees for transportation projects within the FORA plan area.
C. Development pursuant to a development agreement that was entered prior to the Effective
Date of the Joint Powers Agreement in accordance with the terms of the development
agreement in effect prior to the Effective Date of the Joint Powers Agreement.
SECTION 6. Section 3.36.040 of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code, entitled
“Credits or Reimbursements”, shall be added to Chapter 3.36 as shown in bold, italic text as
follows:
3.36.40 Credits or Reimbursements
An applicant who constructs all or part of one of the Transportation Improvement Projects
may be eligible for a credit or reimbursement, as provided herein.
A. Credit or Reimbursement for Regional Transportation Impact Projects funded by the
strategic expenditure plan.
An applicant may be eligible for a credit to be applied against payment of the Regional
Transportation Impact Fee if the applicant constructs or dedicates right-of-way with respect to
all or a part of one of the Transportation Improvement Projects that is, at the time the
applicant enters into an agreement with the City for construction of such project, included in
the prioritization plan of the strategic expenditure plan as a project to be funded.
An applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement if the cost of constructing such a
Transportation Improvement Project, or a part of such Project, exceeds the amount of the
Regional Transportation Impact Fee to be paid by the applicant. The amount of
reimbursement shall equal the difference between the cost of constructing all or a part of the
Regional Transportation Improvement Project and the Regional Development Impact Fee for
the development project.
Reimbursement shall be from Regional Development Impact Fee revenues only, and the right
to reimbursement shall be terminated 10 years from the date the applicant entered into the
agreement for construction of the project.
The amount of credit, or the credit and reimbursement together, shall be in an amount equal
to the cost of the Regional Transportation Improvement Project or portion thereof, as
calculated by the RDIF Agency. The credit, or the credit and reimbursement together, shall be
calculated at the time the applicant enters into an agreement for construction of the Regional
Transportation Improvement Project. The credit shall be granted at the same time. Once
calculated, the amount of reimbursement shall not increase for inflation nor shall it accrue
interest.
B. Reimbursement for Projects Not Funded for Construction in the strategic plan.
If an applicant constructs all or a part of a Transportation Improvement Project that is not, at
the time the applicant enters into an agreement for construction of such Project, included in
the strategic expenditure plan as a Project to be funded, the developer may be eligible for
reimbursement from the Treasurer of the RDIF, provided that the strategic expenditure plan
is subsequently revised to include the improvement as a Project to be funded.
In such event, the amount of reimbursement shall be in an amount equal to the cost of the
Transportation Improvement Project or portion thereof, as set forth in the strategic
expenditure plan, and shall be calculated by the City and the Treasurer of the RDIF. The
amount of the reimbursement shall be calculated when the applicant enters into an agreement
for construction of the Transportation Improvement Project and posts bonds. Once calculated,
the amount of reimbursement shall not increase for inflation nor shall it accrue interest.
Reimbursement shall be from Regional Development Impact Fee revenues only, and the right
to reimbursement shall be terminated 10 years from the date the applicant entered into the
agreement for construction of the Project.
SECTION 7. Section 3.36.050 of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code, entitled
“List of Projects on the Regional Transportation System”, shall be added to Chapter 3.36 as
shown in bold, italic text as follows:
3.36.050 List of Projects on the Regional Transportation System
The Regional Development Impact Fee shall be used to fund all or a portion of the list of
Transportation Improvement Projects described in Exhibit “B” of the JPA.
SECTION 8. Section 3.36.060 of the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code, entitled
“Administrative Costs”, shall be added to Chapter 3.36 as shown in bold, italic text as follows:
3.36.060 Administrative Costs
The City hereby establishes a processing fee or administrative surcharge to defray the
reasonable cost of administration of the RDIF program by the City in an amount to be set by
the Finance Director but which amount shall not to exceed 1% of the fees collected by the City
in accordance with Government Code section 66014 and as otherwise provided by law.
This ordinance shall become effective on the sixty-first (61st) day following its adoption, or upon
certification by the Executive Director of TAMC that the County and eight of the cities within
the County have adopted by resolution or ordinance the Regional Development Impact Fee,
whichever date is later. If the certification by the Executive Director of TAMC does not occur on
or before December 31, 2008, this ordinance shall be void and have no force or effect.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BYTHE-
SEA this _____ day of _________ 2008, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
SUE MCCLOUD, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Heidi Burch, City Clerk
“of the people, by the people, for the people” of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
- 2014/15 Monterey County Civil Grand Jury (2)
- 2015-2023 Housing Element (1)
- Active Code Compliance (5)
- Agenda Bill (128)
- Agenda Forecast (14)
- Agenda Item Summary (686)
- Agreement (24)
- Amendments (22)
- Announcements (1)
- Appeal (45)
- Appointments (4)
- Attachment (10)
- Ballot Measure (1)
- Boards and Commissions (2)
- Budget (5)
- Budget Report (1)
- California Public Records Act (6)
- CalPERS (6)
- CalRecycle (1)
- Capital Improvement Plan (14)
- Carmel Beach Fires (11)
- Carmel Beach Restrooms Project (2)
- Carmel CalPERS Pension Committee Report (1)
- Carmel Chamber of Commerce (3)
- Carmel Fire Ambulance Association (1)
- Carmel Police Department (21)
- Carmel Public Library Foundation (10)
- Carmel Restaurant Improvement District (3)
- Centennial (11)
- Check Register (130)
- Circulation Element (1)
- City Administrator (58)
- City Attorney (26)
- City Budget (20)
- City Council Agenda and Minutes (294)
- City Council Goals (3)
- City Council Members (19)
- City Council Review (1)
- City Objectives and Key Initiatives (2)
- City of Monterey Fire Department (15)
- Claim (1)
- Closed Session (43)
- Coastal Access and Recreation Element (1)
- Coastal Development Permit (2)
- Coastal Resource Management Element (1)
- Code Compliance Report (2)
- Commercial Design Guidelines (1)
- Community Activities and Cultural Commission (12)
- Community Activities and Cultural Commission Agendas and Minutes (66)
- Community Planning and Building Department (16)
- Conflict of Interest Code (2)
- Consultant Services Agreement (6)
- Contract (9)
- Contracts (6)
- Council Report (277)
- Design Guidelines (4)
- Design Review Board (2)
- Design Review Board Agenda and Minutes (20)
- Documents (4)
- Downtown Parking Analysis Walker Parking Consultants (4)
- Emergency Operations (1)
- Encroachment Permit (3)
- Environmental Safety Element (1)
- Exhibit "A" (9)
- Exhibit A (2)
- Facilities Use Plan (2)
- Fair Political Practices Commission (1)
- Farmers' Market (1)
- fi (1)
- Financial Report (3)
- Financial Statement Audit (5)
- Findings (3)
- Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Operating Plan and Budget (2)
- Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Operating Plan and Budget (1)
- Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Operating Plan and Budget (3)
- Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Operating Plan and Budget (3)
- Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Operating Plan and Budget (7)
- Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Operating Plan and Budget (3)
- Five-Year Financial Forecast (2)
- Flanders Mansion (3)
- Flanders Mansion Property (15)
- Flanders Mansion Property Resolution (18)
- Forest and Beach Commission (14)
- Forest and Beach Commission Agendas and Minutes (68)
- Forest Management Plan (FMP) (2)
- Forest Theater Foundation (1)
- Forest Theater Guild (1)
- Forest Theater Use Agreement (2)
- Forest Theatre (20)
- Forest Theatre Design (4)
- Forester Reports (1)
- Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) (1)
- General Municipal Election (7)
- General Plan (1)
- General Plan and Local Coastal Plan (10)
- Government (1)
- Green Building Program (4)
- Green Waste Recovery (7)
- Harassment Prevention Policy (3)
- Harrison Memorial Library and Park Branch Library (1)
- Harrison Memorial Library Board of Trustees (8)
- Harrison Memorial Library Board of Trustees Agendas and Minutes (72)
- Historic Context Statement (2)
- Historic Preservation (2)
- Historic Resources Board (9)
- Historic Resources Board Agendas and Minutes (67)
- Homecrafters' Marketplace (2)
- Hospitality Improvement District (HID) (7)
- Housing Element (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Institute for Local Government (1)
- Introduction (1)
- Investigative Report on City Contracts (1)
- Joint Powers Agreement (1)
- Land Use and Community Character Element (1)
- League of California Cities (5)
- Local Coastal Plan (1)
- Mail Delivery Service (1)
- Master Fee Schedule (1)
- Mayor Dave Potter (2018-2020) (4)
- Mayor Jason Burnett (2014-2016) (14)
- Mayor Steve Dallas (2016-2018) (40)
- Memorandum of Agreement (1)
- Memorandum of Understanding (12)
- Miller Jane Kingsley v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea et al. (2)
- Mills Act Contract (6)
- Monterey County Superior Court (2)
- Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (1)
- Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority (MPRWA) (1)
- Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (1)
- Monterey-Salinas Transit Board (1)
- Monthly Reports (48)
- Municipal Code (30)
- National Parking and Valet (1)
- Negative Declaration (2)
- Noise Element (1)
- Open Space and Conservation Element (1)
- Ordinance (106)
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (1)
- Paramedic Service Provider Agreement (1)
- Pavement Management Program Nichols Consulting Engineers (4)
- Planning Commission (39)
- Planning Commission Agendas and Minutes (85)
- Police and Fire Reports (4)
- Policy Direction (14)
- Proclamation (8)
- Professional Services Agreements (35)
- Public Facilities and Services Element (1)
- Public Records Act Log (9)
- Public Records and Media Request Log (20)
- Public Works Report and Infrastructure Report Card (1)
- Public Workshop (34)
- Quarterly Financial Report (7)
- Request for Proposals (RFP) (2)
- Residential Design Guidelines (2)
- Resolution (599)
- RFEIF for Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property (1)
- RFEIR for Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property (3)
- Salary Schedule (3)
- Scout House (2)
- Separate Cover (42)
- Settlement Agreement (1)
- Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) (2)
- Special City Council Meeting (9)
- Special City Council Meeting Agenda (18)
- Special Event Permit (1)
- Staff Report (619)
- State of the Forest (1)
- Strategic Plan Vision Guiding Values (1)
- Sunset Center Master Plan (1)
- Sunset Cultural Center (23)
- Town Hall Meeting (1)
- Transportation Authority of Monterey County (TAMC) (1)
- Treasure's Report (2)
- Triennial Budget (3)
- Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) (1)
- Vista Lobos Community Room (1)
- Warrants (4)
- Welcome to the Blog (1)
- Whistleblower Policy (2)
- Work Study Session (1)
- Workshop (1)
- World War I Memorial Arch (2)
- Zoning Map (1)
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(216)
- November (27)
- September (35)
- August (24)
- June (36)
- April (16)
- March (34)
- February (29)
- January (15)
-
►
2017
(210)
- December (22)
- November (12)
- September (32)
- August (17)
- July (25)
- June (24)
- May (2)
- April (24)
- March (40)
- February (12)
-
►
2016
(220)
- December (36)
- November (1)
- October (50)
- July (32)
- June (23)
- May (1)
- April (32)
- March (1)
- February (17)
- January (27)
-
►
2015
(253)
- December (2)
- November (25)
- October (44)
- August (48)
- July (19)
- June (7)
- May (31)
- April (20)
- February (19)
- January (38)
-
►
2014
(250)
- November (27)
- October (27)
- September (21)
- August (18)
- June (22)
- May (40)
- March (40)
- February (27)
- January (28)
-
►
2013
(258)
- November (46)
- October (16)
- September (27)
- August (30)
- June (45)
- May (22)
- April (24)
- March (13)
- February (15)
- January (20)
-
►
2012
(264)
- December (19)
- November (18)
- October (25)
- September (22)
- August (20)
- July (26)
- June (19)
- May (10)
- April (42)
- March (22)
- February (21)
- January (20)
-
►
2011
(224)
- December (15)
- October (40)
- September (20)
- July (35)
- June (20)
- May (18)
- April (27)
- February (35)
- January (14)
-
►
2010
(249)
- December (18)
- November (19)
- October (20)
- September (26)
- August (34)
- July (18)
- June (25)
- May (14)
- April (21)
- February (36)
- January (18)
No comments:
Post a Comment